The government has announced that it is abandoning a plan to sell of historic woodland in the UK, including more than a dozen in Sussex.
A panel set up by the government has advised that more than 250,000 hectares of woodland should remain in public ownership.
The U-turn follows a backlash from the public who want to protect one of the UK's iconic natural wonders.
The decision means that some of Sussex's favourite areas of nature such as Friston Forest, near Seaford and Abbott's Wood, near Hailsham will be protected from commercial development.
The government announcement was made by Caroline Spelman, the Environment Secretary after a report was published by the specially commissioned Independent Panel on Forestry.
The panel concluded that the woodlands should be held in public ownership and that the government needs to find other ways to increase revenue to avoid having to sell off woods in the future.
The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural affairs (DEFRA) said that the planned sale of a maximum of 15 per cent off the nation's woodland will not go ahead.
The plans proved deeply unpopular with the public, with more than half a million people signing a petition against the proposals.
Brighton Pavilion MP Caroline Lucas said the decision represented "an incredible victory".
She said: "Today's announcement that the Government will not be selling off our public forests is an incredible victory for the many groups and individuals, including thousands in my constituency, that joined forces to protect the forest estate for people to enjoy today and for future generations.
"There is a real risk that the Forestry Commission's ability to evolve and build upon its track record of innovation and value for money will be hampered by current cuts to its budget and by job losses – the Government must now promise that there will be no further cuts to the Commission's budget and staff."
Source: www.thisissussex.co.uk
Living alone after divorce can feel like liberation. But trust me, it turns into aching loneliness - Daily Mail
|
Like a pit pony breathing fresh air for the first time after years underground — that’s how I felt when I started living alone after 20 years of marriage and bringing up two sons.
It was 1987. My husband Neville and I had separated and my sons Tom, 18, and Will, 19, had gone to university, all at the same time.
The sensible solution was to downsize from our beautiful Georgian house by the river in Richmond, Surrey, to a three-bedroom flat in fashionable Notting Hill, West London.
Empty nest syndrome can be worse for divorced parents
The sensation as I fled the former marital home and opened the door of my very own flat, chosen and bought all by myself, was a mixture of relief and fear.
There were immediate bonuses — no longer were there piles of enormous boots and smelly trainers in the hall and no messy shaving gear in the bathroom.
It was a joy that the toilet seat was never left up and the toothpaste was always just where I left it — and with the lid on.
And I certainly didn’t miss the laundry basket overflowing with dirty jeans and stinky socks or the loud music played by hulking teenagers lolling on sofas.
But fast forward 25 years, and at the age of 68 I am still on my own, living in a large Victorian flat in Oxford. And I have to admit that my attitude to living alone has changed.
While the heady excitement I felt on my first day of moving into my first solo home lasted several years, my days are now often intensely lonely. I can spend whole weekends on my own without seeing a soul.
As you get older, the novelty of being alone can wear off. According to the latest statistics, I am far from alone in my aloneness — one in three people are living alone. Most single dwellers are middle-aged adults aged between 34 and 64 — the vast majority of them women.
It strikes me that this represents a huge sociological change. Before 1950, hardly anyone, male or female, lived alone. Those who did were widely considered misfits, misers, freaks or oddballs. They were shunned by polite society.
After World War II, things began to change when the bedsitter was invented for soldiers returning from conflict and without a home to go to.
Then in the Sixties, what were known as ‘bachelor flats’ or studios began to be built, aimed at single occupancy. They heralded a social shift that has continued to grow ever since.
I took my first faltering steps into singlehood in my mid-40s — like many women of my generation, I had never lived alone before.
I’d left my family home to go to university at the age of 18, shared student flats with friends and then got married on graduation at the age of 21.
Of course, there was sadness at the end of my marriage as well as the bliss of unfettered freedom. My split with Neville was amicable in that no one else was involved but, over the years, we had become different people and no longer wanted the same things out of life.
Once I got back on my feet, I celebrated my newly single status by having the flat decorated the way I wanted: frilly and feminine, in pastel shades and with pale carpets.
The drawback was having to tackle traditionally male chores for the first time. I had to manage the mortgage, the car, the credit card payments and DIY as best I could. There was no one to turn to for a bailout if my finances went awry.
Worse, if the ceiling fell down or the basement flooded — which had happened in the family home — I would have to cope by myself. Gradually, though, my confidence increased and I discovered there was nothing to most of the tasks I had dreaded.
It was a proud moment when I bought a new car, without any male advice or input. And I found I felt in such a good temper all the time; there was no one to argue with, no one to mess things up, no clutter to clear away and no grime to clean.
I found that I had created a serene environment for myself, and this would have been impossible in a shared home.
As a freelance journalist and author, I worked from home, so valued the quietness.
Many of my female friends were getting divorced at the same time — in 1988, it seemed there was an exodus from marriage — and we went on wonderful adventure holidays together, trekking in the Himalayas and even going on camel safaris.
So lonely: Liz Hodgkinson
Few of my women friends were keen to remarry; they were enjoying life too much on their own. Like me, most had rushed into wedlock in their early 20s and thus had never known what it was like to simply please themselves.
We were belatedly, in middle age, doing the things that are standard for today’s young women: exploring the world and savouring our hard-won independence.
At that point, I was never lonely, and I enjoyed inviting friends into my own domain.
There were just so many pluses, I discovered, to this single living lark.
I felt so proud of myself for having the courage to break out and embrace being single.
Then, after four years of being alone, I met fellow journalist John Sandilands, who had also lived on his own since his divorce. We hit it off instantly and wanted to be together. But how?
He lived hedged in by his many collections of marching soldiers, Dinky toys, model ships and nautical paintings. I did not want to deprive him of his quirky objects, yet was not keen to be surrounded by them myself.
We devised what was, for us, the perfect solution. We lived only three miles from each other, so we retained our own homes and met when we wanted to, not because we had nowhere else to go.
This meant my grown-up sons and their partners could visit me without John being there.
Though he got on well with my sons and I with his relatives, John had no children of his own and I did not want to impose on him a family set-up he had never chosen.
If he wanted to watch sport — cricket was a particular obsession — he could sit in front of the TV to his heart’s content without me fussing around.
Who knew?
One in three people are living alone. Most single dwellers are middle-aged adults aged between 34 and 64 — the vast majority of them women
It’s true I did have to listen to his impression of cricket commentator Henry Blofeld, but that was a small price to pay.
It seemed to us that we had the best of both worlds, relationship-wise; alone when we wanted to be, together when we wanted to be and never crowding each other’s space. It felt like a sophisticated and modern way to live.
But sadly, John died in 2004 after 12 years together. And now, as I near the end of my 60s, I have to admit that living alone is no longer so blissful.
Indeed, it is more often bleak and miserable. The freedom that once felt so wonderful can now be oppressive as day after lonely day stretches in front of me.
I face weekends and holiday times alone and ask myself whether I can be bothered to make the effort to go to the cinema, theatre or a party on my own.
Even cooking for myself seems too much trouble. My late mother-in-law lived on nothing but Pot Noodles and cheap ready meals from Iceland after she was widowed, and I vowed I would never do the same.
But it is tempting. I might be a little more upmarket than she was, but I find I am increasingly buying gourmet frozen meals, saving myself the chore of buying ingredients to create a dish.
I sometimes get a glimpse of what it can be like to have someone else in the house, and this makes returning to living alone all the more poignant.
A friend from Australia, whom I have known all my life, occasionally comes to stay when working over here.
We go shopping together and I am reminded how much fun mundane tasks can be when they are shared with good company. There’s a world of difference between going round the supermarket with an entertaining friend and trudging round on your own.
Of course, I am lucky to have a family. My sons and five grandchildren come round occasionally, but they live too far away — Devon and London — to be frequent visitors. Though I’m sure they are interested in my welfare, they don’t need to be spending their time worrying about whether Mum is lonely.
And that’s one of the worst things about living alone when you’re older — the feeling no one really cares about you that much.
Yes, I have good friends, but it’s not the same as having someone intensely interested in you, not just your health, but your achievements.
If I have a new book out, there is no one at home to offer congratulations. The increasing loneliness I feel is not helped by the fact that it seems that every week, another friend or former work colleague dies. Almost all my social occasions these days are funerals.
I don’t wish to be morbid, but this is a reality of growing older. My circle of friends is diminishing instead of increasing.
It is for this reason that the TV presenter Esther Rantzen, who is reluctantly living alone at the age of 71, has founded the SilverLine, a befriending service for the over-65s who have no one to talk to.
Luckily, I’m not quite at the stage where I want to be befriended by a stranger, but I’ve certainly reached the point where I understand the need for such a service.
The agony aunt Marje Proops once told me that though women often want to be alone in their 40s, by the time they are 70 they long once more for the big shoes in the hall, the shaving kit in the bathroom and the men’s jackets and jeans in the wardrobe.
I didn’t believe her at the time, now I know only too well that she was right.
Source: www.dailymail.co.uk
Interview: Sussex and England Lions batsman Chris Nash - The Sport Review
Sussex and England Lions batsman Chris Nash caught up with Henry Cowen at Barnham Primary School, where he was helping to promote the ‘play hard, play fair’ message of MCC Spirit of Cricket.
After an impressive season to date that has seen Nash top Sussex’s run-scoring charts and bowling averages in Championship cricket, the 29-year-old says he harbours international ambitions.
It’s been a positive season for Sussex so far, particularly in the Friends Life t20. Have you been pleased with how things have gone?
Yes, it’s been a great season. It was hard work early on with all the rain and that made the pitches a bit juicy for us openers, but Twenty20 has kicked off really well for me; a couple of fifties and a couple of other scores as well. The team has been playing some brilliant cricket, so we’re full of confidence at the moment.
Is it too soon to start looking towards Twenty20 Finals Day?
Yes, we’ve done that before. We’ve got off to some good starts before where we won eight out of 10 or something like that, so we’d pretty much qualified early on, but then we fell away. We’re trying to learn from that. Obviously this year we’ve had a good start and we just want to keep it going. We’ve got games this week against very strong sides so it’s vital for us to go into the quarter-finals with a couple of wins under our belt.
And things are going well in limited overs cricket in general, with Sussex topping their Clydesdale Bank 40 table too…
Overall in white ball cricket I think we’re unbeaten this year, so we’re going really well. In terms of the Twenty20 what they’ve done with the schedule is much better, allowing teams to concentrate purely on Twenty20 for a month, so our focus has been on that. After the Surrey game on Sunday we go straight into 40-over cricket and the County Championship; so after that we’ll start looking at what’s coming up in the next few weeks.
On a personal note, you’ve had a fair bit of success with the ball this year, leading the Sussex averages in the County Championship. Would you describe yourself as an allrounder these days?
I wouldn’t say I was an allrounder but if you can contribute to winning games as a batter that does a bit of bowling then it’s a massive bonus. It’s something I’ve worked really hard on and something hopefully I can do more of. It’s just nice to be able to chip in, especially in the last Surrey game where I got a couple of wickets, which helped us win.
You’ve been involved with the Lions in the last couple of seasons. Is senior England recognition still in your thoughts?
Definitely, as a county cricketer you’re always aspiring to that. I’m probably entering my prime so if I can keep scoring runs I will hopefully get another chance with the Lions at some stage in the next couple of years. I had a little taste of it last year and the only way you can get into it is by scoring lots of runs for your county.
Does the possibility of international cricket keep you hungry?
It does. You look at the guys playing at the moment; they’re playing some amazing cricket and we’re the top-ranked Test nation. You just need to score heavy runs. Someone like Jonathan Trott just scored mountains and mountains of runs year after year and then got his chance and took it. As county batters we know what we’ve got to do.
Chance to Shine ambassador Chris Nash was helping to promote the ‘play hard, play fair’ message of MCC Spirit of Cricket. Chance to Shine has brought cricket to over 1 million state schoolchildren. The programme costs £5million, or £15 per child, to run each year. To make a donation visit www.chancetoshine.org
Whether you’re an armchair enthusiast or an avid player, All Out Cricket magazine is a great read for cricket fans of all ages and tastes.
Source: www.thesportreview.com
'This is the end for Newhaven' – controversial incinerator fires up - The Guardian
You see it as soon as you come over the headland. The 65-metre chimneys rise above the vast silver roofs. The trees around the incinerator will grow eventually, but for now it sits in a scrubby valley of chalk soil, exposed, and still shinily new.
Controversy has dogged the waste incinerator at Newhaven in East Sussex from the start. The small port town itself has a population of just 12,000, but more than 16,000 objections to the plans to locate an incinerator near the town centre were received from the area.
The county council went against popular sentiment and granted permission. Subsequent attempts for a judicial review were rejected, and the decision was chased all the way up to the then secretary of state Ruth Kelly. She ruled in favour. On Wednesday, after more than 10 years of fighting, the incinerator was officially opened.
The new site will be operated by Veolia, which currently owns seven operational incinerators, which they call "energy recovery facilities", with a further site under construction in Staffordshire. The government says incinerator facilities are expanding rapidly across the country, with 23 operating in England and a further 70 sites at various stages of planning and development.
On both sides in Newhaven, however, it seems the long battle over the plant has been neither forgiven nor forgotten. Outside a small group of protesters held up signs reading "What human rights?". One local woman, dropping off a friend, said that she wouldn't be staying. "It's too late, isn't it? I can't bear to look at it." Pauline Miles, 75, has lived in Newhaven for 46 years and said: "This is the end for Newhaven. Our town has been going down and down and we're the dregs now. The health risks frighten me. Why is it in a town? Why not up country somewhere? All those trucks!"
Inside, speaking at the launch ceremony, Peter Jones, leader of East Sussex council, referred angrily to the "voodoo science" peddled by campaigners, and talked of "the triumph of fact-based evidence over wilful ignorance" that has led to the facility opening. "It is a great shame that due to the misleading information, the liberal population of Newhaven just won't engage with this incinerator as they might."
Incinerators take residual waste – whatever is left over after recycling and compost collections – and turn it into fuel, using the rubbish in place of coal or gas to drive turbines and produce electricity.
At Newhaven the rubbish is trucked in from six different local authorities and tipped down chutes into the vast dump. From the control room, you can peer about 40 metres down into the extraordinary landscape of rubbish; it's possible to pick out wheel hubs, crisp packets and apple juice cartons, but much of it is shredded or just rotted and unrecognisable.
From here the 15 people who run the entire site use joysticks to control enormous grabbers that mix the rubbish and pick up huge bundles to dump into the furnaces. These run at 1000C, heating water and powering turbines to generate, at capacity, 19MW. By comparison, a large onshore wind turbine can have a capacity of 5MW, while the UK's largest power station, coal-fired Drax, has a generating capacity of 3,960MW.
Campaigners claim numerous problems with incinerators as a solution to the UK's waste problems. Shlomo Dowen, of UK Without Incineration Network believes that incinerators are disastrous in terms of climate, cost and efficiency. "There are far more exciting and useful waste disposal technologies coming through now, and incineration is stifling their development."
He also points out that an incinerator requires a certain amount of waste to keep the furnaces going, so the local community is locked into providing that for 20 years, rather than reducing or recycling.
Richard Kirkman, head of technology at Veolia, sees incineration as currently the most environmentally friendly option. Conceding that waste is a less efficient fuel than coal, he counters that the energy produced is far less carbon intensive, at just 275g of CO2 per KWh. That compares with about 910g from coal, and 390g from gas according to figures from the International Energy Agency. "Things will evolve, definitely. This may not be the best solution in 20 years. But for now, for the next 20 years, this is the right thing to do."
On the growing number of incinerators, a spokesman for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, said: "It is one among several waste technologies, a combination of which is needed for sustainable waste management. The government is focused on energy outcomes in terms of maximising outputs and not specific technology." The government has a "waste hierarchy", he said, which places incineration above landfill but below re-use and recycling.
The people of Newhaven remain unconvinced. Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat local MP, boycotted the opening ceremony. "This gigantic intrusion into the landscape was forced on the town against the wishes of virtually all its residents by the Tory county council," he said. "It has damaged the landscape and sent out a message that Newhaven is simply a convenient dumping ground for the rest of the county. There is nothing to celebrate."
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
Divorce Could Boost Tom and Katie's Brands - Huffington Post
Since the inevitable split of Dawson's Creek golden girl Katie Holmes and everyone's favorite Top Gun Tom Cruise, there has been the inevitable chatter about how the decoupling will damage the individual star's brands.
It is true that both Tom and Katie benefited from becoming TomKat. For Tom, Katie added a patina of youth that no plastic surgery can accomplish for a man of 50. She made him seem younger, somewhat hipper. If he occasionally seemed unhinged, even that was alright. An audience loves to love love. And most importantly, Katie gave Tom Suri. In the age of the celebrity baby boom, when spawning is what drives the celebrity brand-building machine, Suri was something the American consumer could truly get behind. For Katie, Tom provided gravitas. Sure, being a stay-at-home mom and full-time keeper of Cruise kept her from appearing in too many movies, but what a celebrity does for work doesn't actually matter anymore. Kate Holmes is one of the few celebrities we can truly call A-list today because of her association with Tom. She could land any magazine cover of her choice tomorrow and her endorsements potential is through the roof. Tom is a star maker. Ask Nicole Kidman.
Now that the pair have dissolved their mutually beneficial union, where do they go from here? Nowhere but up. One of the things the American consumer of celebrity loves even more than a love story is a reinvention.
To ensure their stocks rise, there are a couple things Tom and Katie can do to prevent a backslide of their brands in the wake of the split.
For Tom:
1. Act your age. No one wants to see 50-year-old Tom Cruise have a mid-life crisis and flounce about with women less than half his age. If Tom were to, say, steal Selena Gomez from Justin Bieber, that would be very, very bad for his brand. Cruise needs to date a woman who is age appropriate. It should be someone in her forties, maybe with a couple of kids. The cougars will simply eat that up.
2. Play your age. Mission Impossible is great. Rock of Ages was less great. Tom needs to take on some roles with depth where he isn't swinging from the rafters or taking off his shirt (his abs are weird). Playing the hero is less savory in your fifth decade.
For Katie:
1. Act your age. Didn't it seem like Katie went from 27 to 47 in just five years? Now is the time for Katie to live it up a little, spend time with girlfriends, maybe get a little drunk and ask Jennifer Aniston and Chelsea Handler if she can join them for a Cabo weekend. The 33-year-old should date someone completely inappropriate. John Mayer is single again. Katie needs to remind everyone that she still has at least a decade of marketability at the box office.
2. Make us love you. Give us the one-two punch of a nice sleeper indie coupled with a big romantic comedy. Be adorable.
For Tom and Kat:
1. Don't trash one another. As bizarre as it seemed, folks liked that fairy-tale love story. Let them remember it fondly without allowing reality to seep through the castle walls.
2. Keep Suri happy. This is really all America wants. Keep her smiling in her high heels and both of you will continue to enjoy the fruit of your loins.
Follow Jo Piazza on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@jopiazza
Source: www.huffingtonpost.com
Heidi Klum and Seal 'to divorce' - The Sun
SUPERMODEL Heidi Klum is filing for divorce from singer Seal after six years of marriage, it has been reported.
The couple are calling time on their relationship and papers will be filed at the LA County Superior Court early next week, according to US website TMZ.
German beauty Heidi, 38, will cite “irreconcilable differences”, it is claimed.
On Friday, London-born R&B star Seal, whose hits include Kiss from a Rose, posted a cryptic message on Twitter, writing simply: “The End.”
Seal, 48, proposed to Heidi inside an igloo he had built on a glacier in Canada in December 2004, and the couple have three children together.
London-born Seal also legally adopted Heidi’s first child, who she was pregnant with when they met.
The couple were well-known for renewing their wedding vows ever year in lavish ceremonies.
The reports have come as a surprise to fans.
Rapper and music producer Russell Simmons tweeted: “Sending love and light to Heidi Klum and Seal.”
The couple were often seen lavishing affection on each other, and were a picture of happiness with their kids Leni, seven, Henry, six, Johan, five and Lou, two.
It is not known how the couple will divide their assets, and Heidi raked in almost £13million last year, according to Forbes.
Seal’s income for 2011 is unknown, but he is currently promoting his latest album Soul 2.
Source: www.thesun.co.uk
Sussex woods saved from sell-off (From The Argus) - The Argus.co.uk
Sussex woods saved from sell-off
10:20am Thursday 5th July 2012
Campaigners are celebrating after the Government announced it would no longer try to sell off historic woods to private developers.
The Government has announced it will not sell off the public forest estate after an expert panel called for the 258,000 hectares of woodland to remain in public ownership.
More than a dozen forests in Sussex were among those listed as potential commercial projects including Friston Forest near Seaford and Abbots Wood near Hailsham.
Brighton Pavilion MP Caroline Lucas described the decision as “an incredible victory” but warned forests would remain under threat if the Government imposed further cuts on the Forestry Commission.
Yesterday (July 4), environment secretary Caroline Spelman pledged the forests would stay in public hands following the publication of a report by the specially commissioned Independent Panel on Forestry.
The panel said the estate should remain in public ownership as land held in trust for the nation and that the Government needed to invest in the public forest estate to avoid having to sell off woods to balance the books.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs also confirmed that the planned sale of 15% of the public forest estate, the most that can be sold off under existing legislation, would not go ahead.
The sale to raise up to £100 million had been put on hold while the panel conducted its inquiry.
The sell-off plans caused a huge public outcry when they were announced last year with more than half a million people signing a petition against the proposals.
Speaking yesterday Dr Lucas said: “Today’s announcement that the Government will not be selling off our public forests is an incredible victory for the many groups and individuals, including thousands in my constituency, that joined forces to protect the forest estate for people to enjoy today and for future generations.”
However, she added that questions about the management and funding of the estate remained.
She said: “There is a real risk that the Forestry Commission’s ability to evolve and build upon its track record of innovation and value for money will be hampered by current cuts to its budget and by job losses – the Government must now promise that there will be no further cuts to the Commission’s budget and staff.”
Simon Pryor, the natural environment director for the National Trust, said: “We encourage the Government to adopt and implement this report.
“If it does, the nation’s protest last year will not only have saved the public forest estate, it will also have triggered a step-change in the way we treat woodland in England.”
Source: www.theargus.co.uk
West Sussex students get taste of life as a popstar - Portsmouth
The Chi Rocks project, held at the University of Chichester, saw 60 pupils from across the county work with musicians, industry specialists and song writing students to produce a song that was performed at a showcase concert at the end of the three-day course.
The purpose of the project was to work with schools and use music to raise the aspirations of pupils.
It was organised by Louise Jackson, senior music lecturer, and supported by the university’s Widening Participation department.
Louise said: ‘The purpose of the event was to give pupils a taste of university life, showing them what goes on here and what they can learn if they continue with their education when they leave school. There were some great songs performed at the concert, and it was clear that everyone had put a lot of effort and thought into the music and the way they would market it to their fans.’
Source: www.portsmouth.co.uk
Sussex’s 2nd XI runners-up in SE t20 finals day - Chichester Observer
Sussex’s 2nd XI were the beaten finalists after beating Essex’s 2nd XI in the semi-final, while England had progressed past Worcestershire’s 2nd XI.
Sussex batted first in the opening game against Essex and scored 166-6 from their 20 overs, with 70 from Matt Machan and 32 from Luke Wells.
In reply, Essex never looked set to chase down the total and a devastating spell of 4-17 from James Anyon accounted for the Essex middle order as they could only make 107-8.
Michael Rippon, following up his first-team debut against Kent the previous night when he took 4-23, was again among the wickets and took 3-22.
The victory meant Sussex would go on to face England Under-19’s in the final following their victory over Worcestershire in the semi-final.
Sussex won the toss and, after electing to bat, scored 156-6 with Wells hitting 53, Harry Finch 28, Devon Endersby 23 not out and Will Adkin 21.
The total was not enough, though, as England won by eight wickets with more than two overs remaining.
Alan Fordham, head of first-class cricket operations for the ECB was in attendance and awarded the man-of-the-match award to Ben Duckett, representing Northants, in the England under-19 side.
Joe Hudson, Arundel Castle club secretary, said: “This was a very successful day, for once – this season – played under pleasant weather conditions. We are pleased to have been able to host the event for the ECB.”
Source: www.chichester.co.uk
Ah, this is a sad article. Why is everyone being so mean? She is honest and sincere in her writing. I feel for her.
- Give me a Break, Surfing the World Wide Web, 05/7/2012 15:13
Report abuse