Plans to turn the Olympic Stadium into part of a Formula 1 track are among four bids to use the venue after the 2012 Games.
Football clubs West Ham and Leyton Orient are other bidders, together with the UCFB College of Football Business.
An original deal for West Ham to lease the £486m stadium was scrapped last year amid legal wrangling.
The London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) says bids will be assessed before any negotiations begin.
It says a bid was tabled by Intelligent Transport Services, in conjunction with F1.
The proposal would reportedly allow another British round of the world championship in and around the stadium in East London.
UCFB, which offers degrees in football business, is based at Burnley FC's Turf Moor ground and is an affiliate of Bucks New University.
It is understood Orient's proposal is based on a ground share with West Ham, although the Premier League club has previously insisted it is not considering that arrangement.
F1 chief Bernie Ecclestone said last month that he had been consulted by the Intelligent Transport Services company about plans to use the stadium for a race.
Ecclestone told the Telegraph: "This is a firm that happened to be bidding for use of the stadium, not to own it. They came up with a scheme whereby Formula 1 would race around the stadium, inside it, outside it. They wanted to make sure I would be interested."
Orient chairman Barry Hearn refused to comment on a possible ground share, but told BBC Sport he hoped the League One club's bid could succeed.
"There is no point dwelling on the design of the stadium and the faults of the stadium," he said.
"We have to get on with it, we have to make a fist of it and we have to make sure the Government and the people of this country get maximum value for the investment that has gone into the Olympic Stadium.
"Our idea does that and I think it forms part of a legacy that people in this country can be proud of. Bearing in mind this is the only time in our lifetime that we are ever going to hold the Olympic Games, we need to get something out of it.
"A mixture of usages and a mixture of opportunity within the Olympic Stadium will give us the feeling that we have spent our money wisely and that is really what we are trying to achieve. All sides have to exercise common sense and move forward. I think we have created a very interesting scheme that can do just that."
Essex County Cricket Club has dropped plans for tenancy at the stadium after its partner, the University of London, pulled out of the process.
It has already been announced the 80,000-capacity Olympic Stadium will be reduced after the Games to a 60,000 venue, which retains a running track, and will host the 2017 World Athletics Championships.
The LLDC says it is possible more than one bidder could be successful, with a decision expected in the autumn.
Preferred bidder status has been granted to iCITY, which wants to turn the Olympic press and broadcast centres into a design, technology and research base which might create more than 4,000 jobs. The scheme includes a conference centre, pedestrian square, cafes, restaurants and bars.
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
London 2012: don't be a sceptic – this isn't just about the Games - The Guardian
I long ago got bored with being an Olympics sceptic. Where's the challenge? Where's the joy in simply lowing along with the media herd?
Of course, the whole thing seethes with absurdity. There are those "reassurance" missiles planted on people's roofs, which if used would ensure that terror jets crash and burn in several bits of London rather than one. Behold, the fattest disposable McDonald's you've ever seen at an event that's meant to inspire us to love the gym. How about those shivering sports stars spending four lost hours on a bus from Heathrow to the athletes' village when train and tube would have wafted them to Stratford in 90 minutes tops?
Yet the more anti-Olympics sentiment I've encountered, not just in recent days but throughout the build-up years, the more doggedly optimistic I've become. It's a wary optimism, but no mere contrarian urge. The big point of the hosting the Games, let's recall, is not a few weeks of running, jumping and national flag-waving but to pile momentum behind helping hard-up east London catch up with the capital as whole.
Should we, perhaps, not have bothered? Might it have been better had £9bn of public money not been shovelled the Olympic boroughs' way? Would a more virtuous nation have left them, with their child poverty, overcrowding and chronic unemployment, without a new public park and top-flight sports amenities to go with the new transport links and shopping mall that the promise of the Games helped to haul in?
We can argue, as I would, that such a massive wad of taxpayer cash should have been spent in the wider area in different ways. But without the Games, would a fraction of it have been forthcoming? Would it have been more virtuous of a Labour London mayor (Ken Livingstone) or a London Labour MP who was also minister for sport and culture (Tessa Jowell) not to have fought to harness the ludicrous Olympic allure to the larger cause of rejuvenating parts of the capital that have been hurt by de-industrialisation and historic neglect, and giving at least some of those living there a better chance in life?
It's madness, but also reality. For all the boosterism, the bombast and the preposterous impositions of the International Olympic Committee, what matters most is what happens next. And some of it is going to be good. Take the Olympic Park itself. I walked around it the other week and believe that when opened to the public, starting in a year's time, it will be fragrant, elegant and full of life. Whatever the fate of the main stadium, I'm confident the sports venues will be great to gaze at and a joy to use – and I'll be at the front of the queue.
We can mourn a lost, low-profile nature reserve, but if toads don't thrive in the designed space that has replaced it, if bees don't buzz there and if bats don't breed beneath the new bridges over the freshened strands of the River Lea, a lot of gardening and wildlife experts will have got a great deal wrong. Are we opposed to public parks? Would we prefer Green, Victoria and Brockwell gone?
The twilit industrial zone that has also been cleared away provided great material for passing poets of ruination – and I wasn't immune to its unglamorous charms myself – but not many people had jobs there. The Olympic borough of Newham was so devastated by the loss of London's docks that Professor Anne Power of the London School of Economics has likened its history to Liverpool's. Do we want it to be left to decline as Liverpool was?
There is no doubt that big, urban redevelopment projects create losers as well as winners, and that the goals of big vision dreamers and local people on the ground can be hard to reconcile. There's no denying, either, that Olympics have a disreputable past as a catalyst of regeneration. But with London, there is so much to play for.
Those lost in lamentation should instead direct their emotional energies towards big decisions the mayoral corporation will take about the park's future job and housing provision and the approach of the host boroughs to ensuring that their poorest residents derive the maximum benefit from the great sweep of change planned for the Lower Lea Valley as a whole.
Intense and often prosaic political battles need to be fought on terrain that's less gratifying for plaintive artists, but where the fates of people who lead less privileged lives will unfold over the coming decades. Arguments over whether legacy promises have been kept, including how they should be measured, will go on for just as long.
But success isn't so hard to define: a sub-region of the capital whose existing residents are healthier, wealthier and happier than they were before and whose newcomers contribute to keeping things that way.
The Games are just one chapter of a much bigger London story, from which many other cities will seek to learn. It is one giant regeneration test case. The truly Olympian struggle has barely begun.
• Follow Comment is free on Twitter @commentisfree
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
Olympic torch arrives in Kent to kick off four-day county tour - Kent Online
Comments |
Read all comments on this story.
Picture Gallery
Torchbearer Nesii Burns runs through Tunbridge Wells
Martin Apps
Giovanni Merlo hands over the flame to Patrick Collins
Jess Banham
Excited children await the Olympic torch in Tunbridge Wells
Martin Apps
Crowds line The Pantiles, Tunbridge Wells, ahead of the Olympic torch arriving
Schoolchildren await the arrival of the Olympic torch in Tunbridge Wells
Martin Apps
Hundreds of people turn out to see Dame Kelly Holmes with the Olympic torch at Tonbridge Castle
Matthew Walker
The Olympic torch has arrived in Kent - to the delight of thousands of cheering spectators in Tunbridge Wells.
Flag-waving fans turned out in force to paint the town red, white and blue as they lined the streets to welcome the flame to the county.
Crowds up to six people deep whooped as each of the 10 relay runners proudly held the torch aloft through the town in the sunshine.
The torch entered the county for the start of a four-day tour just before 11.30am.
It was only in the county for about half-an-hour before heading to Crowborough, in East Sussex.
However, Kent was given more Olympics torch excitement this afternoon at Tonbridge Castle.
Kent-born Dame Kelly Holmes, who won gold in the Athens Olympics in 2004 carried the flame in the castle grounds with Frank Verge, a torchbearer in the 1948 relay.
Hundreds of people gathered in the town to catch a glimpse of one of Kent's most successful sporting daughters with Mr Verge, who was 22, when he ran from Platt through Ightham.
The torch entered Tunbridge Wells at Mount Ephrain Road at 11.24am before snaking through the town to Eridge Road at just after midday.
The first torchbearer in Tunbridge Wells was Italian sports writer Giovanni Merlo, who handed over the torch to British sports journalist Patrick Collins.
Patrick handed over the flame to Russian former athlete Olga Bogoslovskaya.
The sprinter won a silver medal in the 4x100m relay in the 1992 Olympics in Barcelona.
Among the other torchbearers was charity worker Alex Gerrity, 20, 17-year-old dance teacher Samantha Wheelwright and champion cyclist Emily Barnes - also 17 and pictured above left.
The relay had particular poignancy for 15-year-old torchbearer Nesii Burns.
She battled a rare birth defect called proximal femoral focal deficiency, which affects the pelvis.
Nesii - who used to have one leg 9cm shorter than the other before undergoing two gruelling operations - is now hoping to inspire other children with the same condition.
The torch will travel a total of 108 miles today - carried by 137 torchbearers - before ending the day in Hastings.
But it will be back in Kent tomorrow, starting in Hamstreet, and touring the county until Friday afternoon.
Don't forget to follow our unique multimedia coverage throughout the four days.
We will have a team of reporters and photographers out covering the whole event - along the route and even on the convoy.
We will be giving you blow-by-blow coverage of the relay online and on air at kmfm - with regular updates on our interactive map.
Don't miss out on your personal souvenir of Kent's torch relay.
Our 32-page supplement is being specially printed, and will be out in the shops from first thing on Saturday.
It will feature the highlights of all four days of Kent's relay - with loads of pictures of the once-in-a-lifetime event.
For just 50p, the supplement will be available in most supermarkets and newsagents.
If you can't get hold of a copy and would like one, call our
team on FREEPHONE 0800 424450.
Monday, July 16 2012
The KM Group does not moderate comments.
Please click here for our house rules.
Comments (17)
Post a Comment
-
Shirley Knott wrote:
Only if it's a Coke bottle I presume lol...Ridiculous!!!
17 Jul 2012 2:10 PM
-
Dumdum wrote:
You can take an empty water bottle in and use the water fountains provided according the the article I read.
17 Jul 2012 1:56 PM
-
Shirley Knott wrote:
@Sb
Total expected expenditure for 2012 Olympics:
14.8 Billion dollars.Expected return:
7 Billion Dollars:
Total profit:
- (Thats MINUS)7.8 Billion Dollars.
That's how much it's costing US.
To be honest I have no problem with the Olympics (if I'm allowed to use that word without being sued) per se... only the cost and the disruption it will cause... Not forgetting the BIG corporations who WILL be making the money.17 Jul 2012 1:50 PM
-
Norsewind wrote:
I cant believe that you cannot take your own food or water into the event, else you will get thrown out ... and all the hungry and thirsty spectators will be allowed to have is a McChuckups and Coca cola
17 Jul 2012 1:43 PM
-
Shirley Knott wrote:
Mike... Finally another person without rose tinted glasses (and a bit of brain) thank you for restoring my faith in people.
17 Jul 2012 1:42 PM
-
mikehunt wrote:
Shirley Knott I love you.
It seems people are too thick to realise we are paying for this corporate sponsored sports day. The last thing they care about is the sport. This is the fat cats getting richer and using the olympics to blind people.
Mcdonalds, coca cola sponsoring a sport event? yeh that makes sense.
Its not inspired anyone I know to take up sport, if anything its inspired me to hat people in suits more
17 Jul 2012 1:27 PM
-
Dumdum wrote:
Okay, so it is a bit of local chaos for a very short while, and if you look at the time table it is just a 'blip' in the timetable our busy lives.
It's optional whether you choose to go and see it or not.
I shall go and watch, for the simple reason that it will never happen again in my lifetime!
Same reason that I watched the Tour De France all those years ago.17 Jul 2012 1:07 PM
-
Neal with an "A" wrote:
I just don’t see the point of this relay. Why does it need to be paraded around the whole of the Kingdom??
It must be costing a fortune with 24 hour security, police presence, 4 coaches, 18 support other vehicles & 2 stages travelling all around the place.
And who thought about abseiling it down a building, rowing with it down a river, taking it up a mountain, and how many times has it gone out? Just to be relit from the mother flame that is travelling on a coach??? Surely that would make that the Olympic flame? (But travelling on a coach?? The mind boggles)
Don’t get me wrong I'm looking forward to the Olympic Games and have tickets to a number of events, but this is just a farce. It’s all because people outside of London don’t feel apart of it. But at the end of the day the Olympic bid was won by London. Not Great Britain & definitely not Ireland. And its London tax payers who have paid for the games.17 Jul 2012 12:57 PM
-
SB wrote:
The biggest event in the entire world. Why can't those that don't want/like it just accept it for what it is? It will be gone in September and then you'll never see it again in your lifetime. It brings great investment into the country, local contractors benefit, tourists will flock in even more than usual spending their money. Moan moan moan. That's all we do. God this country and small minded people/media make me sick.
17 Jul 2012 12:47 PM
-
Shirley Knott wrote:
@ Zedboy.
A PART of the cost of the games is met by 'sponsorship' - (Cost of the UK games this year approximately 15 BILLION US dollars.)The cost for upgrading roadways, closing roads, cost to the economy (and no, NO olympic games has EVER made a profit for the host nation)etc etc. is met by US THE TAXPAYER... Complete waste of money.
I agree we are ALL entitled to our own opinion, (that does include me) but why should I have to increase my working day by another 2-3 hours journey time because someone wants to run around and let off a few million pounds worth of fireworks?17 Jul 2012 12:34 PM
-
zedboy wrote:
Shirley:
How many times do people have to be told... it is all paid for by corporate sponsors.
I LOVE IT - brilliant for communities, young and old.
17 Jul 2012 12:21 PM
-
rocket wrote:
I agree with Clive why are people from Russia, Italy etc running with it, it should be local people who should be recognised, not the likes of WILL I AM wth has he done for the UK come he and sing......
But has anyone noticed that ALL the BBC presenters have managed a leg......
17 Jul 2012 11:16 AM
-
clive loves gills wrote:
one moan
too many foreign torchbearers - should be more local people - heard about that guy from kent on the news last week who has raised thousands for charity by running that endurance marathon in the us desert several times - got rejected - yet any so and so from abroad gets to do it just to be p.c. and keep sponsors happy
17 Jul 2012 10:12 AM
-
clive loves gills wrote:
shirley
just because it isn't for you, doesn't really give you the right to stop anyone else from enjoying it
we all have our likes and dislikes, how woudl you like it if soemthign you loved was tkane away from you just because some miseralbe busybody moaned about it?
a few hours of minor disruptions isn't much toa sk really is it!
it's a bit like when people moan about all the sport on tv, the euros, wimbledon and now the olympics! awful that tow events that happen every four years and one that is annual are shown on tv, what about what these moaners watch EVERY week of the year - some people just want it all ways
there are enough bad things in life, let's just enjoy this while it is here
17 Jul 2012 10:08 AM
-
Dan Gleballs wrote:
Oddly enough, I get a gold for coming second at home.....
17 Jul 2012 9:57 AM
-
Norsewind wrote:
So what if it causes disruption, apart from the media who have gone well over the top in this event, there are people that actually enjoy this and have spent months planning and looking forward to this .. its a few hours chaos and disruption for some but for others it is a lifetime of memories never to be repeated, so just go with it.
As for me, i can't stand it all but who am i to stop others enjoying it all ..:)17 Jul 2012 8:31 AM
-
Shirley Knott wrote:
Hooray Hooray!!
More road disruption... More cost to the taxpayer... More hysteria from the media...
Really looking forward to it.... NOT!!!17 Jul 2012 7:30 AM
Source: www.kentonline.co.uk
Police appeal following fatal collision in Dartford (From News Shopper) - News Shopper
Police appeal following fatal collision on Princes Road A282/M25 roundabout in Dartford
11:41am Tuesday 17th July 2012 in News By Kelly Smale
KENT Police is appealing for witnesses following a fatal collision in Dartford this morning (July 17).
Officers were called just after 8am to reports of a collision between a white Peugeot 306 and a motorcycle on the roundabout where Princes Road meets the A282/M25.
A man who was riding the motorcycle was pronounced dead at the scene.
The slip on to the M25 anticlockwise from Princes Road is closed and is likely to remain shut until around 1pm, while officers from the Serious Collision Investigation Unit carry out investigations.
Anyone with information should call PC Jamie Woodhams on 01622 798538.
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Or
Source: www.newsshopper.co.uk
Print Article
Buy a KM Picture