Monday, 11 June 2012

Kent Police backs drive to protect vulnerable adults - Kent News

Kent Police backs drive to protect vulnerable adults - Kent News

Public awareness events being held in Medway as part of Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults week

The county’s force is backing an awareness campaign aiming to protect vulnerable adults.

The drive forms part of Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults week, which runs from today until June 15, with a number of drop-in events being held.

Kent Police said the campaign shines a spotlight on the abuse that elderly or those with a disability can be subjected to.

Police officers will be taking part in local events with other Kent-based agencies such as NHS, Trading Standards, Kent Fire and Rescue Service and Medway and Kent County Councils.

In Medway, there will be a public awareness stand offering advice and information on:

June 11 at Gillingham Market, 9am to 4.30pm

June 12 at Strood Market, 9am to 3pm

June 13 at Pentagon Shopping Centre, Chatham, 9am to 5pm

June 14 at Rochester Hub, 9am to 3pm

June 15 at Rainham Shopping Centre, 9am to 4pm

Detective Superintendent Tim Smith of Kent Police said: “Abuse can take many forms and it can be difficult to identify abuse is taking place unless there are obvious outward physical signs.

“For example, the elderly and those who have mental disabilities can often be subject to financial abuse if others gain access to their bank details or exploit a loss of memory.

“Abuse may also take the form of neglect and not providing for a vulnerable person’s basic living needs.

“Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults Week intends to combat and prevent such abuse by giving carers and those who are themselves at risk the tools to spot signs of abuse and how to act on them once identified.

“This is an invaluable opportunity to work with local partners to highlight an important section of the community who depend on our joint services to protect them. Together, we hope to reduce the threat of abuse towards all vulnerable adults in Kent.”

0 comments


    Source: www.kentnews.co.uk

    Undoing health law could have messy ripple effects - The Guardian

    RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

    Associated Press= WASHINGTON (AP) — It sounds like a silver lining. Even if the Supreme Court overturns President Barack Obama's health care law, employers can keep offering popular coverage for the young adult children of their workers.

    But here's the catch: The parents' taxes would go up.

    That's only one of the messy potential ripple effects when the Supreme Court delivers its verdict on the Affordable Care Act this month. The law affects most major components of the U.S. health care system in its effort to extend coverage to millions of uninsured people.

    Because the legislation is so complicated, an orderly unwinding would prove difficult if it were overturned entirely or in part.

    Better Medicare prescription benefits, currently saving hundreds of dollars for older people with high drug costs, would be suspended. Ditto for preventive care with no co-payments, now available to retirees and working families alike.

    Partially overturning the law could leave hospitals, insurers and other service providers on the hook for tax increases and spending cuts without the law's promise of more paying customers to offset losses.

    If the law is upheld, other kinds of complications could result.

    The nation is so divided that states led by Republicans are largely unprepared to carry out critical requirements such as creating insurance markets. Things may not settle down.

    "At the end of the day, I don't think any of the major players in the health insurance industry or the provider community really wants to see the whole thing overturned," said Christine Ferguson, a health policy expert who was commissioner of public health in Massachusetts when Mitt Romney was governor.

    "Even though this is not the most ideal solution, at least it is moving us forward, and it does infuse some money into the system for coverage," said Ferguson, now at George Washington University. As the GOP presidential candidate, Romney has pledged to wipe Obama's law off the books. But he defends his Massachusetts law that served as a prototype for Obama's.

    While it's unclear how the justices will rule, oral arguments did not go well for the Obama administration. The central issue is whether the government can require individuals to have health insurance and fine them if they don't.

    That mandate takes effect in 2014, at the same time that the law would prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage to people with existing health problems. Most experts say the coverage guarantee would balloon costs unless virtually all people joined the insurance pool.

    Opponents say Congress overstepped its constitutional authority by issuing the insurance mandate. The administration says the requirement is permissible because it serves to regulate interstate commerce. Most people already are insured. The law provides subsidies to help uninsured middle-class households pay premiums and expands Medicaid to pick up more low-income people.

    The coverage for young adults up to age 26 on a parent's health insurance is a popular provision that no one's arguing about. A report last week from the Commonwealth Fund estimated that 6.6 million young adults have taken advantage of the benefit, while a new Gallup survey showed the uninsured rate for people age 18-25 continues to decline, down to 23 percent from 28 percent when the law took effect.

    Families will be watching to see if their 20-somethings transitioning to the work world will get to keep that newfound security.

    Because the benefit is a winner with consumers, experts say many employers and insurers would look for ways to keep offering it even if there's no legal requirement to do so. On Monday, UnitedHealth Group Inc., the nation's largest insurer, is announcing that it will continue to offer coverage to young adults even if the health care law is struck down.

    But economist Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute says many parents would pay higher taxes as a result because they would have to pay for the young adult's coverage with after-tax dollars. Under the health care law, that coverage now comes out of pre-tax dollars.

    Fronstin says there's no way to tell exactly how much that tax increase might be, but a couple of hundred dollars a year or more is a reasonable ballpark estimate. Upper-income taxpayers would have a greater liability.

    "Adult children aren't necessarily dependents for tax purposes, but an employer can allow anyone to be on a plan, just like they now allow domestic partners," said Fronstin. "If your employer said, 'I'm going to let you keep this,' it would become a taxable benefit for certain people."

    Advocates for the elderly are also worried about untoward ripple effects.

    If the entire law is overturned, seniors with high prescription costs in Medicare's "donut hole" coverage gap could lose annual discounts averaging about $600. AARP policy director David Certner says he would hope the discounts could remain in place at least through the end of this year.

    Yet that might not be possible. Lacking legal authority, Medicare would have to take away the discounts. Drugmakers, now bearing the cost, could decide they want to keep offering discounts voluntarily. But then they'd risk running afoul of other federal rules that bar medical providers from offering financial inducements to Medicare recipients.

    "I don't think anyone has any idea," said Certner.

    A mixed verdict from the high court would be the most confusing outcome. Some parts of the law would be struck down while others lurch ahead.

    That kind of result would seem to call for Congress to step in and smooth any necessary adjustments. Yet partisan divisions on Capitol Hill are so intense that hardly anyone sees a chance that would happen this year.


    Source: www.guardian.co.uk

    USA Muslim Matrimonial - Owen Sound Sun Times
    Irony of the mankind is that, it was the man who created boundaries at the first place and now in today’s world, it’s the very same man who mocks it through the means of increased reach throughout the planet be it a business or a video conference at the comfort of the cabin. Man has learnt to traverse across boundaries just because of a feeling responsible behind this wandering, which is love. It is the love of a person towards a substance, human or culture which compels him to break across the boundaries and carry on the pursuit of the loved thing he is looking for.

    We must have heard several love stories which happened irrespective of borders and must have wondered how they’d materialized it, how they met, how they started it off and finally how in the world they struck the chord and decided to get settled. If you think that such stories are limited to only privileged few, think again. Zarooratrishta.com brings you the secret of the overseas marriage from the country where love is in the air. We bring you the best possible matrimonial solution for your bride or groom from the genuine and verified single Muslims in US so that your overseas pursuit for a Muslim partner can become a lot easier. We keep a verified database of single Muslims in US and are currently on the brink of becoming the pioneers of Muslim Matrimonial USA.

    Usually Muslim Marriage Sites offer you matrimony from only area of your native or residence or even if they happen to offer you matrimonies from across the planet, you don’t have the option to verify it as profile photos may be misleading. We keep a thoroughly verified database of handpicked Muslim matrimonies USA because we know that nikah is usually the affair of grand celebrations, not keeping up with apprehensions that come supplementary with its planning for which zarooratrishta.com offers you a complete peace of mind so that your celebrations remain celebrations not only for your friends or relatives but for you as well.


    Source: www.owensoundsuntimes.com

    Kent State Vs. Oregon, 2012 College World Series: Flashes Drop Game 2 By 1 Run - SB Nation

    Kent State's incredible 21-game winning streak came to an end late Sunday night in Eugene, as the Flashes dropped the second game of the Super Regional against Oregon. The Golden Flashes led for most of the game until a costly two-error seventh inning led to the three runs for the Ducks, who closed it out for the 3-2 win.

    George Roberts opened the scoring for Kent with a massive blast to left field in the second inning. In his next at-bat, Roberts added to the lead with a ripped double to centerfield that scored catcher David Lyon. KSU would squander an opportunity to plate additional insurance in the fourth but they would hold the 2-0 lead until the Ducks' rally in the seventh. Ryan Bores had a strong start for Kent, but the hiccups on defense were his undoing in the three-run Oregon rally.

    Kent had a chance to tie it in the bottom of the ninth but could not even it up after T.J. Sutton led off with a double. A sacrifice bunt try failed, stranding Sutton at second with one out. Oregon then brought on closer Jimmie Sherfy, who quickly struck out the final two batters to preserve the win. It was a frustrating loss but Kent will still have an opportunity to become the first MAC team to reach Omaha since 1976 with a win on Monday night.

    For more 2012 NCAA Baseball Tournament coverage, be sure to stay right here with SB Nation Cleveland's StoryStream. For more coverage of Kent State and the Mid-American Conference, check out Hustle Belt.


    Source: cleveland.sbnation.com

    No comments: