Sunday, 1 July 2012

City of London Festival, Mansion House, London - Financial Times

City of London Festival, Mansion House, London - Financial Times

After the celebrations of the past month any further talk of jubilees may seem excessive. Founded in 1962, the City of London Festival is 50 this year and is fortunate that its jubilee was timed so that it just missed being trumped by its regal counterpart, especially as they shared some of the same City landmarks.

This year’s festival opened last week with a service and concert in St Paul’s Cathedral. From the beginning the aim has been to spread music through the streets and historic buildings of the City, especially those not usually open to the public. This year’s 50th anniversary programme includes more than 100 free outdoor events and among the most prestigious of the indoor venues is Mansion House, home of the Lord Mayor of London.

It is always a pleasure to attend a concert in the Egyptian Hall, not least as the acoustics are surprisingly good given its barrel-vaulted design. Seating about 350, it is ideal for a medium-sized band of period instruments and this concert featured the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment, conducted by Edward Gardner, hot-foot from a blistering performance of Britten’s Billy Budd at the London Coliseum the night before.

The central attraction, albeit brief, was one of this year’s festival commissions. In theory, Tansy Davies’s Delphic Bee is a site-specific piece, as it takes its inspiration from the beehive on the roof of Mansion House, but it is unlikely that this could have been divined from any of its four short movements. The interest here was in hearing the striking sonorities that can be drawn from a nine-piece wind ensemble of period instruments – venomous (perhaps buzzing?) horns in the first movement, cocky bassoons in the third. Delphic Bee did not add up to much, though.

On either side, Gardner and the OAE played some uplifting Mendelssohn. Alina Ibragimova was the elegant soloist in the Violin Concerto, her slim, vibrato-lite tone spinning silken lines, and in the faster movements she really put on some pace. Gardner and the orchestra just kept up with her and in the Symphony No.4, the “Italian”, countered with some sprightly Mendelssohn of their own. Their final “Saltarello” left the City of London speed limit standing.

www.colf.org


Source: www.ft.com

Katie 'plotted divorce from Tom for WEEKS and rented a Manhattan hideaway to escape with Suri' - Daily Mail

By James Nye and Daily Mail Reporter

|


Katie Holmes allegedly plotted her divorce from Tom Cruise for weeks, even renting an exclusive apartment to hideaway with daughter Suri.

The Dawson’s Creek star has reportedly taken refuge in a smart Chelsea property where monthly rents cost between $4,000 and $25,000, reported the New York Post.

The Seventh Avenue building where Holmes is allegedly hiding out is close to the couple’s West Village pad.

Plotting: Katie, seen here with Suri on June 26, allegedly plotted her divorce from Tom for weeks

Holmes is reportedly not staying in the couple's townhouse even though Cruise is in Iceland to film his latest movie.

Residents in the posh Chelsea apartment building claim to have spotted Holmes there every day for the past three weeks.

Holmes filed divorce papers in New York on Thursday which revealed she is seeking sole custody of six-year-old Suri.

With a financial pre-nuptial already in place, it is thought that Holmes purposefully filed for divorce in New York state and not California because New York dislikes giving warring parents joint custody.

With sole custody of Suri, Holmes would be able to remove her daughter from the Church of Scientology, which she is alleged to dislike and distrust, despite her husband's enthusiasm for it.

Recruiting East Coast attorney Jonathan Wolfe for the divorce, Holmes will be expected to honour the terms of her rumoured pre-nuptial agreement with Tom Cruise in a New York court.

'It's the public policy of New York state to recognise pre-nuptial agreements,' said attorney Paul Talbert, a partner at Chemtob Moss Forman & Talbert LLP.

However, Holmes is known to be independently wealthy through her own television and film career, so there is no financial benefit in filing for divorce in New York.

The fact remains that New York family law judges do not like giving fighting parents joint custody because they believe that causes endless conflicts in the children or children's lives.

With Suri reportedly attending a Scientology-influenced school in California, Holmes would be able to remove her if she was granted sole legal custody.

Pictured with her daughter three times this month, it is thought that Katie Holmes filed for divorce in New York because judges there prefer to give sole custody and not joint custody to warring parents

Tom Cruise is known for his razor sharp legal team and would be expected to fight Holmes tooth and nail for his child, even mounting a legal challenge to have his divorce put through a Californian court instead.

He and Holmes filed their marriage certificate in California in 2006.

'He didn't ask for this lawsuit,' points out Talbert.

'I don't think that, as Katie Holmes, you need to be scared of Tom Cruise just because of who he is.

'I think she will do just fine, especially in terms of child support.'

Katie and her daughter Suri were spotted in New York yesterday while Tom Cruise films his new movie in Iceland

Other family law experts predict that this could become one of the bitterest divorces in years, with Suri at the centre.

They point out that in the cases of other celebrities such as David Arquette and Courteney Cox, both parties agreed on joint custody.

'It's not the kindest, gentlest way she could have done things,' said divorce attorney Stephanie Blum.

Dream wedding: The pair married in an Italian castle in 2006

Dream wedding: The pair married in an Italian castle in 2006 and filed their marriage certificate in California

Hollywood superstar Cruise, 49, said he was ‘deeply saddened’ that his younger wife, 33, had filed for a separation.

He revealed the former Dawson's Creek actress had initiated the split, bringing a dramatic end to one of Hollywood's most high-profile romances.

'This is a personal and private matter for Katie and her family,' Holmes's lawyer Jonathan Wolfe said in a statement to People magazine.

'Katie's primary concern remains, as it always has been, her daughter's best interest.'

Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

The marriage was even worse than I thought - Cruise has been directing everything including the choice of school for the child. A mother's love for a child is something he cannot control. I hope Katie attains sole custody. That child needs it.

It's wrong and sexist that women automatically think they should get sole custody of a child.

Does anybody really care ?

Deep in my gut, when I saw photos of Katie and Suri day in and day out in N.Y. I felt something was up. We've never seen this much of her before. Despite being criticized, she always made sure to appear out and about with Suri. Now its clear that she wanted to show she had residence there, but also to show the world that she is Suri's primary caretaker-that SHE is the one taking care of Suri while Tom is off all over the world shooting movies. No matter what you think of the situation, you have to admit that she's one smart cookie.

She knows that his people would bugg any house she stayed in, in order to get the upper edge, so I would do exactly the same as her and stay somewhere totally independant. I wish her all the best, but fear for her safety right now. She needs some good, reliable friends right now. Bless her X

I hope Tom wins joint custody of Suri.

She has likely plotted the divorce for many MONTHS, not just weeks. Clearly it is a huge step, which has probably involved much heartache, and these decisions don't get made suddenly. Also, I imagine Tom, if he is as controlling and narcissistic as portrayed, could be menacing and difficult to get away from. All her divorce arrangements need to be watertight and keep Kate and Suri absolutely safe. Good luck to her.

dont blame her

I have to say that more and more this looks like someone who is trying desperately to escape. Good luck to her.

That whole story reminds me of this movie with Julia Roberts: "Sleeping with the Enemy"....Life imitating art...

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.


Source: www.dailymail.co.uk

Is This a New Trend - A June Spike in Divorce Enquiries? - huffingtonpost.co.uk

While traditionally we have been used to reports of spikes in divorce enquiries in January and September, over the last couple of years my colleagues and I at Prolegal have seen the number of enquires for divorce increase in June.

Could it be that for some couples the prospect of the school holidays precipitates divorce? That the mere thought of spending their summer holiday together is enough to send them over the edge and going running towards the divorce courts?

In the past divorce spikes have come after established holiday periods - due to the strain of spending family time together or to couples hanging on in there until after holiday periods to avoid upsetting their families.

Yet, people now seem to be taking the view that two weeks spent with their partner, locked together in a different environment with no distractions, could be problematic.

Statistics suggest the recession may be putting unnaturally high pressure on relationships.

According to the Office for National Statistics, at the end of 2011, the divorce rate was up 5%, from 113,949 to 119,589, after years of decline.

Without the comfort blanket of financial security couples are left with the bare bones of what may not always be a pretty sight.

In the modern world, the days of stay-at-home mothers (or fathers) is becoming more unaffordable.

Levels of personal debt are at an all-time high, the cost of mortgage borrowing still represents a huge burden (as although interest rates are at an historic low, many couples remain in fixed rate mortgages or have reverted to standard variable rates which have recently been increased by some lenders) and bonus payments have fundamentally changed.

So we operate in a society where economic reality dictates that both parties have to go to work.

And for some couples I would suggest the fact that they are both so busy and rarely see one another, actually papers over the cracks in their relationship. This all falls away at holiday time and there is no escape from the realisation that actually they no longer wish to spend "quality time" together.

We live in a throwaway society. When our television breaks down we make no effort to have it fixed, we just throw it out and start again. Although I would like to think that people view their relationships a little differently, I fear that for many this is not the case. The average length of a marriage in this country is 11 years - just one year more than the guarantee on the Miele washing machine you bought when you got married!

Jonathan West is head of family law at Prolegal


Follow Jonathan West on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jonathanwest3


Source: www.huffingtonpost.co.uk

Puddle of Mudd Singer Wes Scantlin -- Seals Divorce with a Smiley Face - TMZ.com

Puddle of Mudd Singer Wes Scantlin -- Seals Divorce with a Smiley Face - TMZ.com
0629_puddle_mudd
Puddle of Mudd singer Wes Scantlin was so happy to finally end his marriage ... he signed the divorce docs with not one, but TWO smiley faces!

TMZ has learned ... Wes' 4-year marriage to a hot blond chick named Jessica is one step closer to being terminated ... with the rocker agreeing to fork over $2,500 per month in alimony.

Jessica originally wanted the court to toss out their pre-nup so she could reap half of Scantlin's fortune ... but she ultimately withdrew her request after the two sides came to an agreement about how they will divide the assets.

Obviously Wes was happy with the outcome -- as evidenced by the smiley faces.

Jessica's lawyer, Brian Kramer, tells TMZ, "It’s most definitely the first time in all my years of doing this work that I’ve have had an opposing party sign with a smiley face on a divorce decree imposing maximum spousal support.

He adds, "It’s certainly a refreshing change to see an artist who is cheerful about honoring such an obligation instead of treating it like it were the end of the world."


Source: www.tmz.com

Tom Cruise Using Same Powerhouse Attorney Used for Nicole Kidman Divorce - ABC News

Tom Cruise took the lead in filing his first two divorces.

This time the shoe is on the other foot, but he will have a familiar face at his side. Dennis Wasser, the Los Angeles based powerhouse divorce attorney who represented Cruise in his divorce with actress Nicole Kidman, will represent the actor against Katie Holmes in the celebrity divorce bombshell of the year.

A source familiar with the actor confirmed Wasser has taken the case, adding that a yet to be chosen New York attorney will also join the Cruise legal team.

When asked if Cruise would try to move the case from New York to California the source would only say that "the approach will focus on the best interests of the child."

Some legal analysts have said that Holmes' decision to file for divorce in New York may give her an advantage in her effort to gain sole custody versus joint custody and provide more privacy since New York seals divorce filings that are often available in Calfornia.

California divorce attorney Michael Kelly told the Associated Press that Holmes' East Coast filing "a tactical move" that signifies "there will be an attempt to gain an advantage."

New York's comparative-fault divorce laws could be advantageous for Holmes, he said. The couple lived in Los Angeles.

But this divorce battle has just begun.

With Wasser fighting for Cruise and Holmes is supported by Jonathan Wolfe and mega divorce attorney Allan Mayefsky, who represented Christie Brinkley in her divorce battle with Peter Cook.

Cruise's publicist said the actor was "deeply saddened" by Katie Holmes' divorce filing last week, and a source close to the "Rock of Ages" star told ABC News that Holmes' decision came as a "complete surprise."

33 The Magic Number For Cruise?

The previous times Cruise has gotten divorced, he was in control. Curiously all of Cruise's marriages ended when his ex-wives were 33 years old.

Cruise filed for divorce from his second wife, Nicole Kidman, in February 2001 sometime after she miscarried their baby according to Kidman (they had previously adopted two children). He dropped the bomb less than two months after they renewed their vows on their 10-year-anniversary, Christmas Eve 2000.

PHOTOS: Tom and Katie Before the Split

Kidman broke down on Oprah Winfrey's talk show in May 2001, calling the situation a "nightmare."

"I think that divorce is hard for anyone. It's a nightmare, it just is, and you can pretend you're fine," she said. "And days you're great [and] days you're not great."

In a written response to a divorce petition filed by Cruise on the grounds of irreconcilable differences, Kidman said she was stunned when he told her that he no longer wanted to be married, and allegedly begged him to stay and seek marriage counseling. He refused and left for good, according to her response.

When asked by Winfrey whether she thought she would always be married, Kidman timidly replied, "Yeah."

"I've had a blessed life," she said. "I've always thought [if] something bad is going to happen, something bad is going to happen.

But then something really bad happened. A number of really bad things happened. You go, 'I'm dealing with it. I'm stronger than I thought.'"

Kidman is now happily married to country singer Keith Urban. They have two children together.


Source: abcnews.go.com

Is This a New Trend - A June Spike in Divorce Enquiries? - huffingtonpost.co.uk

While traditionally we have been used to reports of spikes in divorce enquiries in January and September, over the last couple of years my colleagues and I at Prolegal have seen the number of enquires for divorce increase in June.

Could it be that for some couples the prospect of the school holidays precipitates divorce? That the mere thought of spending their summer holiday together is enough to send them over the edge and going running towards the divorce courts?

In the past divorce spikes have come after established holiday periods - due to the strain of spending family time together or to couples hanging on in there until after holiday periods to avoid upsetting their families.

Yet, people now seem to be taking the view that two weeks spent with their partner, locked together in a different environment with no distractions, could be problematic.

Statistics suggest the recession may be putting unnaturally high pressure on relationships.

According to the Office for National Statistics, at the end of 2011, the divorce rate was up 5%, from 113,949 to 119,589, after years of decline.

Without the comfort blanket of financial security couples are left with the bare bones of what may not always be a pretty sight.

In the modern world, the days of stay-at-home mothers (or fathers) is becoming more unaffordable.

Levels of personal debt are at an all-time high, the cost of mortgage borrowing still represents a huge burden (as although interest rates are at an historic low, many couples remain in fixed rate mortgages or have reverted to standard variable rates which have recently been increased by some lenders) and bonus payments have fundamentally changed.

So we operate in a society where economic reality dictates that both parties have to go to work.

And for some couples I would suggest the fact that they are both so busy and rarely see one another, actually papers over the cracks in their relationship. This all falls away at holiday time and there is no escape from the realisation that actually they no longer wish to spend "quality time" together.

We live in a throwaway society. When our television breaks down we make no effort to have it fixed, we just throw it out and start again. Although I would like to think that people view their relationships a little differently, I fear that for many this is not the case. The average length of a marriage in this country is 11 years - just one year more than the guarantee on the Miele washing machine you bought when you got married!

Jonathan West is head of family law at Prolegal


Follow Jonathan West on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jonathanwest3


Source: www.huffingtonpost.co.uk

Divorce as per Islamic laws and Indian Muslims - Meri News

THERE ARE various kinds of divorce mechanisms as practiced by Muslims all over the globe. The most dominant and prevalent among them is divorce by husband which has three forms: talaaq, ila and zihar. The other is by mutual consent and it has two forms: khula and mubarat. The third one among them is divorce proceeding initiated by wife and it has two forms: talaaq-i-tafweez and lian.

Talaaq means dissolution of marriage by husband using right words. Among the Sunnis, talaaq may be express, contingent, constructive or even delegated. The Shia law recognizes only the express and delegated form of talaaq. A Muslim male of sound mind who has attained puberty can take talaaq. According to Sunni law, a talaaq may be oral or in writing, whereas as per Shia law, the talaaq must be pronounced orally except when husband is unable to speak. Shias require two witnesses whereas Sunnis require none. In ila, husband takes the oath not to have sexual intercourse with his wife and if he keeps his words for the following four months, the marriage dissolves irrevocably.

In zihar, the husband compares his wife with a woman with whom he can’t keep relationship, such as, mother or sister. After such a comparison, he expresses the wish for divorce and does not cohabit with his wife for the following four months. The divorce follows.

Khula is a mechanism by which couple arrives at agreement to divorce each other in lieu of compensation paid by the wife to her husband out of her property. If and when the husband gives the consent it results in divorce. In mubarat, both the husband and the wife are happy to get rid of each other. For Sunnis use of mubarat option implies end of all obligations and rights. For Shias the reason for using mubarat should be irreconcilable differences.

In Talaaq-i-tafweez or in delegated divorce, the husband delegates his power of pronouncing divorce to his wife or any other person. In lian, if the husband levels false charges of unchaste and adulterous behavior on his wife, the wife is free to seek divorce. There is another way by which Muslim females in India can seek divorce and that is through dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act 1939.

According to this act, a female married as per Islamic law can seek divorce with her husband if the whereabouts of her husband have been unknown for a period of four years or if the husband has neglected her maintenance for the past two years or if the husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of seven years or more or if the husband has failed to perform, without reason, his marital obligations, or if the husband was impotent at the time of marriage and still is or if the husband has been insane for two years or if the wife was given in marriage by her parent or guardian before she was fifteen or if the husband treats her with cruelty.

Islamic laws give power bigger than those of sovereigns to males in marital matters. The fact is that as per Sharia, a wife can’t divorce her husband at her own wish. She requires the consent of her husband to do so. In India, which is a secular country constitutionally and dominated by Hindus demographically, Muslims enjoy limited application of Sharia laws in the form of Muslim personal laws.

As per Sharia the husband is not liable to pay maintenance to his divorcee once the period of iddat, which is usually three month long, ends. The fact is though Indian courts meekly maintain the right of divorced Muslim females to get alimony in any form at least till she is not remarried and also the right to get money for raising minor children, the reality is that after the Shah Bano fiasco, in which the ruling of the apex court was overruled by amending the laws of the Parliament, Muslim males are virtually immune from such orders largely.

In order to understand this world comprehensively, the understanding of both relativistic and absolute aspects of life is essential. Koran is the Final Testament as Prophet Mohammad is the last Prophet of Islam. Equally true is the fact that Muslims consider Sharia to be universal law though interpretations can change with time and Islamic laws are therefore, not fully immutable. But for Muslims, it matters a lot whether they are majority or minority of a nation and that of a society.

India is multi-religious, multi-lingual, multi-ethnic society: as diverse and pluralistic as one can imagine. Giving a preferred and special treatment to any of the constituents promotes segmentation and continuity of status quo for many and resistance to change and opposition to change in the required directions for many others. The most important thing is that time has changed and it has changed forever. The consciousness and technology has crossed a threshold mark that requires urgent reinterpretation of all that belong to the past within acceptable social norms. Of course, it is difficult for some to change without all changing and the dominance of the West implies that it will always try to convert the world to its way of life and that promotes reactionary tendencies among the non-Westerners.

The equally important argument is that majority of Indian Muslims are as ardent believers of Islam as subjected to their evolutions and in their local contexts as Saudis and Iranians are and therefore it becomes difficult for even Indian Muslims to change without all Muslims changing.

Saudi Arabia and Iran are nations not ready to change but India is. But it is always a question of statistics; the fact is that the Saudis have enough orthodox elements within their society that Saudi Arabia will always resist the change. The same is not true for Indian Muslims; some of them being the most liberals but again here the statistics and distributions count.

While the majority up to 85% to 90% can stick to traditional interpretation of Islamic texts as permissible and as possible in India, the remainder can move to modernity. Indian Muslims should have the choice to be governed by mainstream laws as applicable to general population or to be governed by personal laws. The liberalism is required by all constituents of Indian society to adjust to the changing consciousness and technologies, maximally from Hindus. But as a compulsion of time the same is required from Indian Muslims though not to the equal extent.

The interpretation of laws could be subjective, conditional and more importantly class and caste oriented. Inequality is the law of India. If some of the Muslims opt for general laws as applied to Hindus they can get additional social benefits and caste promotion by Hindus even though they may not require this. Both liberal and orthodox Muslims are required for keeping the balance within Indian society and making a posture to the outside world. For this reason the Muslim clergy should not mind another Shah Bano because its effect would not be contagious. For majority of Muslims anyway the laws would be their own laws. But liberalism can be soothing for many Muslims and for the Indian society.


Source: www.merinews.com

Kent’s commuters urged to prepare for “exceptionally busy” Olympic travel - Kent News

Kent’s commuters urged to prepare for “exceptionally busy” Olympic travel - Kent News

More than 250,000 extra people expected to use the county’s rail and road networks

KENT’S commuting workforce is being warned to prepare for travel hell during the Olympics with more than a quarter of a million extra people expected to use the county’s rail and road networks every day.

While excitement builds around the upcoming Games, transport authorities are urging people using Southeastern trains to plan well ahead, with 110,000 extra passengers expected each day over the Olympic period.

And workers travelling to and from the city by road are being told categorically by Transport for London to avoid the Olympic Road Network (ORN), which includes the approach to the Blackwall Tunnel, one of the main routes into London from Kent.

Huge pressure on roads in and out of London is expected to force motorists to use the notorious Dartford Crossing, with fears it could become a gridlock nightmare, handling as many as 300,000 vehicles a day during the Games – double the usual amount.

And problems will continue during the Paralympics, with the closure of main roads by Brands Hatch race circuit near Swanley – including the A20 into London – where road cycling races and trials are taking place from September 5-8. The roads will be closed for six days from September 3.

Traders in West Kingsdown, an area expected to be most badly affected, said it will cause a huge loss in business, and residents have voiced fears over potential increased travel times, where a normal three-mile journey from the village to nearby Farningham, for example, will be a 31 mile trek due to diversions onto the M20.

Transport chiefs said they were doing all they could to avoid disruption, but that congestion was inevitable.

A Highways Agency spokesman said all planned road works had been suspended, including on all those expected to be used as an alternative to the ORN.

He said resources would also be stationed near key points should any incidents occur.

“As a key delivery partner for the Games, the Highways Agency has been working with Transport for London, the Olympic Delivery Authority and other partners for some time to help ensure that the roads we manage serve both the Games family and non-Games traffic,” he said.

Traffic plans show that an approach lane both northbound and southbound to the Blackwall Tunnel will be reserved for VIPs, athletes and media representatives called Games lanes.

At the final approach to the tunnel, both north and south, the Games lane traffic will have to merge in with public motorists, a system expected to create a bottleneck.

For people wanting to turn onto the A13, drivers will have to merge with Games traffic.

Motorists are expected to avoid the Blackwall Tunnel and instead use the Dartford Crossing during the Olympics, which run from July 27 to August 12.

But the Government has so far refused to agree to open the toll booths to allow free flowing traffic, despite calls from council chiefs in Dartford and Thurrock, in Essex, who warned of traffic chaos.

Road minister Mike Penning said the Government was not expecting significant increases in traffic volumes at the crossing.

“We are carefully considering how Dartford Crossing will operate during the Games,” he said.

“We have carried out detailed planning work with our delivery partners to ensure the road network is ready for the Olympics, and will continue to consider measures that will help to keep traffic moving at the crossing.”

A Department for Transport spokeswoman told KoS there would be an announcement made next week with regards to the situation at Dartford.

For commuters using Southeastern’s rail service, the situation is expected to be no better.

The Government has stressed the need to prioritise spectators and people going to the Games.

Queuing systems will be put in place at key stations, including Ashford, Sevenoaks and London terminals, to limit the number of people on platforms.

The high-speed service will become a Javelin shuttle service and will operate between St Pancras, Stratford and Ebbsfleet, with the occasional train to Faversham.

There will be a minimal high speed service to Broadstairs, Ramsgate, Canterbury West, Margate, Minster and Sturry between July 27 and August 12 and no service at all to Folkestone stations, Dover, Deal or Sandwich.

Spokeswoman for Southeastern Sarah Boundy said services will be exceptionally busy.

“We’re expecting 25 per cent more people travelling on our train services each day – more at weekends when there are free events in London,” she said.

“For example we carry around 450,000 people every weekday now and during the Olympics we expect another 110,000 each day.

“So people must allow extra time for their journey.”

To see the Olympic train timetable go to www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/olympics and for road information see www.getaheadofthegames.com.

0 comments


    Source: www.kentnews.co.uk

    Proclaiming the wonders of Sussex - eastbourneherald.co.uk

    A CAMPAIGN to show off the best of Sussex and attract tourism during the Olympics was launched at Eastbourne International Tennis Week.

    The Love Sussex drive got underway at Devonshire Park where AEGON staff were decked out in special t-shirts and arranged themselves into the shape of a heart.

    Pink bags were also handed out to tennis fans during the day, containing lots of information on Sussex as well as pin badges, stickers, bookmarks and pens.

    A Love Sussex website went live last month and is jam packed with information on the county and suggestions for days out in the hope of enticing people visiting the capital for the London Olympics to catch a train south in their spare time.

    Eastbourne Borough Council’s head of tourism, Councillor Neil Stanley, said, “Using the AEGON International as a way to promote why we Love Sussex is a great idea for Eastbourne.

    “It’s a fantastic event to highlight why we’re delighted to be joining forces with other Sussex destinations for the Love Sussex campaign. This is definitely the year to promote our region, since there is so much going on in London and if people are looking for things to do out of the city our county is so diverse that there’s something for everyone.”

    The website is at www.lovesussex.com.



    Source: www.eastbourneherald.co.uk

    London 2012: Another slow start leaves Usain Bolt trailing Yohan Blake - The Guardian

    London 2012: Another slow start leaves Usain Bolt trailing Yohan Blake - The Guardian

    Yohan Blake delivered a shock that will be felt all the way to London 2012 by handing the world's fastest man, Usain Bolt, a rare defeat in the Jamaican Olympic trials. On a night when anticipation of quick times charged the atmosphere of Kingston's national stadium, Blake did not disappoint the large crowd. In a furious dash down the track, he recorded a time of 9.75sec to claim the 100m title, comfortably ahead of a fast-finishing Bolt, who clocked 9.86, just getting by Asafa Powell for second, who finished third in a time of 9.88.

    For Blake, this went a long way in settling doubts about the 22-year-old sprinter's quality, but for Bolt, the world record holder, it was a performance that raised questions in the buildup to next month's Games. All three men qualified for the Jamaican Olympic team and will line up against a formidable US contingent when the Games start on 27 July.

    A few stunned spectators still slumped forward in their chairs stared blankly in disbelief following the sub-10 second race, hardly able to fully comprehend the sight of Blake still celebrating a well-deserved win on the bright blue track. Yet an upset had not been wholly unexpected.

    Bolt finished first in his semi-final heat, in 10.01, only just ahead of Michael Frater, after another wretched start left the Olympic champion with plenty of work to do to get back to the field. He did it easily enough, as he had in the first round, but perhaps the disapproving headshake on crossing the line was the clearest sign that things were not quite right for him.

    "Asafa and Yohan, these guys have good top-end speed so for me to get left in the blocks like that was not a good thing. I guess it was just one of those things," Bolt said.

    "In the semi-finals the guy in lane seven moved and it threw me off. I keep seeing these guys in my peripheral vision. It's kind of hard to ignore them. When they move it throws you off and then you get left. After you get left like that it is always hard to get back."

    Bolt's sluggish start had been cause for concern, particularly after losing his world championship title to Blake after a false start in the 2011 final in Daegu. This season there was no occasion more evident that timing his acceleration from the blocks is still a problem than the 10.04 he recorded in Ostrava, where Bolt got away slowly, before recovering with a trademark late burst. He beat Powell twice, with impressive times of 9.76 (Rome) and 9.79 (Oslo) but again seemed to find the starting blocks more like giant sand traps that a means of propelling himself forward.

    At his best the 6ft 4in superstar has never been a quick starter. However, his tardiness should be a worry for both himself and his coach Glen Mills, who coaches Blake as well. But Mills, while stating that he was not surprised by the performance of any of the athletes, dismissed any concerns about a substandard performance in London.

    "I wasn't surprised by his performance, Bolt is not at his best but he is good enough to compete," Mills said. "We are right where we want to be going into London. We just want to keep them healthy and that is key. We didn't send Yohan to Europe so he is in far better shape than Bolt at this time, but we have four weeks. We will take it in stride and we know exactly what to do."

    Bolt and Blake are set for another showdown in the 200m final today as both cruised into the semi-finals. Bolt won his heat in 21.21 and Blake his in 21.43, both running into strong headwinds.

    The Olympic 100m champion Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce sent a clear warning to rivals hoping to claim her crown, as the diminutive sprinter blew away the other competitors on the way to a new personal best of 10.70sec. Despite a slow start to season Fraser-Pryce's dismissal of a strong field, which included the world champion Carmelita Jeter, at a grand prix in New York, gave clear indication that she was rediscovering her best form. Fraser-Pryce seems to have improved the last part of her race. "The people that work hard are going to be the ones able to defend their title in London," she said.


    Source: www.guardian.co.uk

    TomKat to Split: Katie Holmes Files for Divorce from Scientologist Hubby Tom Cruise - ibtimes.co.uk

    Like us on Facebook   

    "This is a personal and private matter for Katie and her family. Katie's primary concern remains, as it always has been, her daughter's best interest," Holmes's attorney Jonathan Wolfe said to People in a statement.

    Cruise, 49, got the blow from his 33 year old wife just a few days before his 50th birthday on 3 July.

    Blindsided Cruise

    Sources say that Tom Cruise was totally uninformed about Holmes' decision to end their marriage until he learned about the divorce suit. The actor is in Iceland, filming his new sci-fi film Oblivion.

    Is Scientology to Blame?

    Scientology is supposedly the major factor behind the divorce. Cruise has been following Scientology since the 1990s and his first wife, actress Mimi Rogers, was believed to have introduced him to the controversial religion that rose in the 20th century. Cruise, an advocate for the Church of Scientology, has been known for being outspoken and giving controversial statements on psychiatry.

    The "irreconcilable differences" of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, who married in November 2006, are also said to be related to their six year old daughter Suri Cruise's religion choices. While Cruise has been arguing that Scientology should be an important part of Suri's life at her age, Holmes did not want him to control religion-related matters, according to insiders, TMZ reports.

    Follow us on LinkedIn Follow IBTimes LinkedIn LinkedIn


    Source: www.ibtimes.co.uk

    Katy Perry: 'Watching Russell Brand divorce in doc was uncomfortable' - Digital Spy

    Source: www.digitalspy.co.uk

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes' divorce 'won't be recognized by church of Scientology' - Daily Mail

    By Louise Boyle

    |


    The divorce of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes will not be recognized by Scientology, according to the church's doctrines.

    The religion offers little advice to those for whom divorce has become the only option, preferring to focus on providing couple's therapy to fix relationships.

    Katie, 33, filed divorce papers from 49-year-old Cruise on Thursday after it was reported that she had been unhappy in the marriage for years. The former Dawson's Creek actress was seeking sole custody of the couple's six-year-old daughter Suri, in what is expected to become a bitter legal battle.

    Dream wedding: The pair married in an Italian castle in 2006 and filed their marriage certificate in California

    Dream wedding: The pair married in an Italian castle in 2006 and filed their marriage certificate in California

    There is a belief in the church of Scientology that marital problems come from 'withholds' or 'overts' - undiscussed issues or problems.

    According to the official website, marriage is considered essential to family life along with the  belief that the religion will strengthen bonds between partners.

    Scientologists also claim that people who follow the religion are more likely to stay married.

    If a couple runs into a problem, they can take courses on how to improve their marriage or speak to counselors.

    However Stephen Kent, a religion professor at the University of Alberta, told ABC: 'There's no real annulment in the church. Many members have been divorced, even founder L. Ron Hubbard was married three times.'

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes were married in November 2006 in a fairy-tale, A-list wedding at a 15th century Italian castle before a church of Scientology minister.

    When the romance began – Katie had met Tom to discuss the possibility of appearing in Mission Impossible III – she was immediately sent on an intensive and lengthy study course about Scientology, the religion founded by sci-fi author L Ron Hubbard in 1954, which holds that humans are descended from an exiled race of aliens called Thetans.

    Support act: The church offers courses and advice to couple's with marital problems

    Support act: The church offers courses and advice to couple's with marital problems

    Although Holmes was raised a Catholic, she embraced the religion of her new husband at the start of their relationship. However she is alleged to have come to dislike and distrust the movement.

    The church of Scientology bans members from having contact with doubters of the faith or unbelievers called PTS - potential trouble source.

    A difference of religious viewpoints can lead some Scientology members to divorce.

    Holmes, 33, is believed to have blind-sided her Mission Impossible star husband by initiating divorce proceedings.

    The divorce of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes looks set to become a bitter custody battle for their six-year-old child Suri.

    With a financial pre-nuptial already in place, it is thought that Holmes purposefully filed for divorce in New York state and not California because New York dislikes giving warring parents joint custody.

    With sole custody of Suri, Holmes would be able to remove her daughter from the Church of Scientology despite her husband's enthusiasm for it.

    The estranged couple have been raising Suri in accordance with the doctrine of the Church of Scientology - treating her as an adult, free to make her own decisions.

    Church-goers: Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes on their way to the Scientology Celebrity Center in Los Angeles when they were first married

    Church-goers: Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes on their way to the Scientology Celebrity Center in Los Angeles when they were first married

    Pawn: The couple's six-year-old daughter has been caught in the middle of what is likely to become a bitter divorce battle as Holmes fights for sole custody

    Pawn: The couple's six-year-old daughter has been caught in the middle of what is likely to become a bitter divorce battle as Holmes fights for sole custody

    Hollywood superstar Cruise said he was ‘deeply saddened’ that his younger wife had filed for a separation and was concentrating on his three children. Cruise has two adopted children Conor and Isabella with ex-wife Nicole Kidman.

    Cruise revealed that Katie had initiated the split, bringing a dramatic end to one of Hollywood's most high-profile - if bizarre - romances.

    'This is a personal and private matter for Katie and her family,' Holmes's lawyer Jonathan Wolfe said in a statement to People magazine.

    'Katie's primary concern remains, as it always has been, her daughter's best interest.'

    Cruise, who is the main breadwinner of the couple's $275 million fortune, has been married twice before.

    He was married to actress turned professional poker player Mimi Rogers - who is believed to have introduced him to Scientology - followed by Nicole Kidman.

    Skeptic: Katie Holmes is said to dislike and distrust Scientology - of which her estranged husband is a vocal advocate - and no longer wants their daughter to be raised in accordance with its doctrines

    Skeptic: Katie Holmes is said to dislike and distrust Scientology - of which her estranged husband is a vocal advocate - and no longer wants their daughter to be raised in accordance with its doctrines



    Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

    The comments below have not been moderated.

    I wish i had their problems!

    I wonder if the latest episode in the life of this loon will get him leaping about Oprah's sofa...

    What gives this woman the right to sole custody of the child of a marriage. The child is as much her husband's as hers and he has just as much right to custody. It really makes me angry that the majority of women think they have a God given right to the child/ren of a marriage. Men have rights as well

    If his religion does not accept divorce, does a marriage which comes after the divorce make it bigamy? - Libby, Houston TX, 30/6/2012 21:31 - It's the same in the catholic church. Your divorce isn't recognised in the catholic church, just means you can't get remarried in the catholic church. Suspect it's the same with Scientolgy

    Carol, Sussex - You can't possibly know what has gone on between them, and for all you know, she may have done her utmost to solve the problems in the marriage, but have been left with no choice but to end it.

    good for her and suri .. may God bless her x

    It wont be recognised because it's not a real church!

    If his religion does not accept divorce, does a marriage which comes after the divorce make it bigamy?

    To be honest its mean of Katie and very immature. No matter how miserable she was/is and especially having a young daughter . She has had plenty of time to go to marriage guidance or considering their wealth to hire a nanny and have romantic weekends or stay with Tom on set in his trailer, just generally try and make things work, if you set your mind to it. But to go behind someones back and file papers, find an apartment, THEN phone your husband probably before you phone the newspapers is horrible. Its also clear she has no communication skills or not able to express that she wasnt having her needs met and give him a chance to respond. It really does come across that she didnt care about him for a long time but was happy to have the trappings of his wealth. Tom, give her whatever she wants and dont stoop to her level, let her have sole custody if she wants, end of the day you have the right to see your daughter and you have the right ot be involved in her life

    I don't his wife cares whether his alleged church recognizes divorce so long as the USA courts do.

    The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.


    Source: www.dailymail.co.uk

    London Olympics rain preparation: 250,000 ponchos - msnbc.com

    A quarter of a million rain ponchos, an army of volunteers equipped with umbrellas and rain jackets, and five dedicated weather forecasters -- it must be a British Olympics.

    Planning any outdoor event during the unpredictable British summer, renowned for its potential to throw up more rainy spells than sunshine, requires drawing up contingency plans and keeping a close eye on the weather.

    Multiply that challenge for several million spectators, 70,000 volunteers and 10,500 of the world's top athletes, and then you have some idea of the challenge facing organizers of the London Olympics.

    The United Kingdom's national weather forecaster, the Met office, has a dedicated five-person team working on Olympic weather predictions, but said it was too early to forecast with any accuracy conditions for the July 27-Aug. 12 Games.

    However, organizers are confident bad weather would not disrupt their plans, while the love-hate relationship between the British public and their country's weather looked likely to ensure solid support for the athletes.

    "By definition, being British you have no choice but to prepare for the weather," said Debbie Jevans, director of sport for the London Organizing Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games.

    Jevans is responsible for making sure the sporting venues across the UK run smoothly. She is not losing any sleep over the possibility of wet weather in the middle of summer.

    "It doesn't keep me awake at night. Clearly if you gave me the choice of rain or no rain, you'd rather have no rain and that's for the spectators as much as anything else," she said.

    "(But) we've known from day one when we looked across the sports that they will happen whether it's raining or not, and so the plans have always included that."

    Those plans have been extensive.

    At Greenwich Park, Britain's oldest royal park that also forms part of a world heritage site, specialist consultants have been drafted in to make sure the venue is up to the challenge of hosting the equestrian events.

    "We've been working on the wet areas in the park for the past two and a bit years now," said Lee Penrose, project manager at the Sports Turf Research Institute.

    Their work has focused on the 5.7 kilometer cross-country course that is seen as the most exposed of the equestrian events to bad weather conditions.

    STRI said over one hundred million "thin but really, really deep" holes had been bored into the course every three weeks to ensure there was no standing water on the turf.

    In addition, up to 40 staff armed with mechanical water-removing devices and last-resort hand pumps will be on site for the July 30 event -- just in case.

    "You can never really plan for all events but notwithstanding a biblical-type flood I think the cross country course is going to run pretty well on the day," Penrose said.

    The cancellation of the high-profile Badminton Horse Trials event after the UK's wettest April in more than a century underscored the need for meticulous preparation.

    The wet weather already experienced this year has also proved a blessing in some respects. Heavy rain throughout some of the test events held across London gave planners the chance to tweak their preparations.

    However, knowing that the sport will go ahead regardless of the weather may be cold comfort for the spectators.

    At the eastern end of the Olympic Park the high stands of the Riverbank arena that hosts the hockey competition are uncovered and exposed to elements. A test event held in early May left some spectators chilled to the bone.

    "It was good, so I'm looking forward to the Olympics events, but the weather will play a big part," said Morag Campbell, an admin worker based in London who watched the test events and holds tickets for several hockey sessions during the Olympics.

    "On the Saturday night my feet were frozen - by the time I got home they were literally blue!"

    For some, wet weather may even prove a bonus.

    Part of the event planning has involved kitting out the stores inside the venues with enough wet weather gear to keep spectators dry and happy -- around 250,000 red, white and blue ponchos will be on standby in case the heavens open.

    In addition, stalls inside the venues will sell Olympic-branded umbrellas for between £14 and £20 ($22-32).


    Source: www.msnbc.msn.com

    London 2012: East London residents march over missiles - BBC News

    Campaigner Chris Nineham told the BBC's Ben Geoghegan it was ''a mad plan''

    East London residents opposed to plans to site surface-to-air missiles on roofs for added security during the Olympics, are to march through Bow.

    Six sites have been picked for surface-to-air missiles, some in residential spots, including Bow and Leytonstone.

    Campaigners say 1,000 people have signed a petition in protest.

    The Ministry of Defence said the safety of the Games was paramount and a "broad range of community engagement" had taken place.

    Air threat

    The sites, chosen from an original list of 100, include the Lexington Building in Tower Hamlets and the Fred Wigg Tower in Waltham Forest, east London.

    The four other London sites identified as suitable for Rapier missiles are Blackheath Common; Oxleas Wood, Eltham; William Girling Reservoir, Enfield and Barn Hill in Epping Forest.

    The proposals have yet to be confirmed.

    Campaigner Chris Nineham said: "We don't believe they will add anything to security. If they are going to be used they will explode over some of the most densely populated areas in London."

    He added: "I simply don't believe that since 9/11 a security system hasn't been put in place to protect Canary Wharf and east London.

    "If fighter jets are sent from another country I hope they will be taken out before they get to London."

    When a major security exercise took place in April standing joint commander General Sir Nick Parker explained there must be a plan which could deal with "the unlikely but very serious threat" that might exist to the Olympic Park.

    He explained: "It's an air threat, really categorised in two ways, the sort of 9/11 threat everyone knows about, and also for the lower, slower type of target which might pop up closer to the Olympic Park, which we would need to intervene."

    Residents of Fred Wigg Tower, Leytonstone, have launched legal proceedings in the hope of preventing the installation of missiles on their building's roof during the Olympics.


    Source: www.bbc.co.uk

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes' divorce 'won't be recognized by church of Scientology' - Daily Mail

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes' divorce 'won't be recognized by church of Scientology' - Daily Mail

    By Louise Boyle

    |


    The divorce of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes will not be recognized by Scientology, according to the church's doctrines.

    The religion offers little advice to those for whom divorce has become the only option, preferring to focus on providing couple's therapy to fix relationships.

    Katie, 33, filed divorce papers from 49-year-old Cruise on Thursday after it was reported that she had been unhappy in the marriage for years. The former Dawson's Creek actress was seeking sole custody of the couple's six-year-old daughter Suri, in what is expected to become a bitter legal battle.

    Dream wedding: The pair married in an Italian castle in 2006 and filed their marriage certificate in California

    Dream wedding: The pair married in an Italian castle in 2006 and filed their marriage certificate in California

    There is a belief in the church of Scientology that marital problems come from 'withholds' or 'overts' - undiscussed issues or problems.

    According to the official website, marriage is considered essential to family life along with the  belief that the religion will strengthen bonds between partners.

    Scientologists also claim that people who follow the religion are more likely to stay married.

    If a couple runs into a problem, they can take courses on how to improve their marriage or speak to counselors.

    However Stephen Kent, a religion professor at the University of Alberta, told ABC: 'There's no real annulment in the church. Many members have been divorced, even founder L. Ron Hubbard was married three times.'

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes were married in November 2006 in a fairy-tale, A-list wedding at a 15th century Italian castle before a church of Scientology minister.

    When the romance began – Katie had met Tom to discuss the possibility of appearing in Mission Impossible III – she was immediately sent on an intensive and lengthy study course about Scientology, the religion founded by sci-fi author L Ron Hubbard in 1954, which holds that humans are descended from an exiled race of aliens called Thetans.

    Support act: The church offers courses and advice to couple's with marital problems

    Support act: The church offers courses and advice to couple's with marital problems

    Although Holmes was raised a Catholic, she embraced the religion of her new husband at the start of their relationship. However she is alleged to have come to dislike and distrust the movement.

    The church of Scientology bans members from having contact with doubters of the faith or unbelievers called PTS - potential trouble source.

    A difference of religious viewpoints can lead some Scientology members to divorce.

    Holmes, 33, is believed to have blind-sided her Mission Impossible star husband by initiating divorce proceedings.

    The divorce of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes looks set to become a bitter custody battle for their six-year-old child Suri.

    With a financial pre-nuptial already in place, it is thought that Holmes purposefully filed for divorce in New York state and not California because New York dislikes giving warring parents joint custody.

    With sole custody of Suri, Holmes would be able to remove her daughter from the Church of Scientology despite her husband's enthusiasm for it.

    The estranged couple have been raising Suri in accordance with the doctrine of the Church of Scientology - treating her as an adult, free to make her own decisions.

    Church-goers: Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes on their way to the Scientology Celebrity Center in Los Angeles when they were first married

    Church-goers: Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes on their way to the Scientology Celebrity Center in Los Angeles when they were first married

    Pawn: The couple's six-year-old daughter has been caught in the middle of what is likely to become a bitter divorce battle as Holmes fights for sole custody

    Pawn: The couple's six-year-old daughter has been caught in the middle of what is likely to become a bitter divorce battle as Holmes fights for sole custody

    Hollywood superstar Cruise said he was ‘deeply saddened’ that his younger wife had filed for a separation and was concentrating on his three children. Cruise has two adopted children Conor and Isabella with ex-wife Nicole Kidman.

    Cruise revealed that Katie had initiated the split, bringing a dramatic end to one of Hollywood's most high-profile - if bizarre - romances.

    'This is a personal and private matter for Katie and her family,' Holmes's lawyer Jonathan Wolfe said in a statement to People magazine.

    'Katie's primary concern remains, as it always has been, her daughter's best interest.'

    Cruise, who is the main breadwinner of the couple's $275 million fortune, has been married twice before.

    He was married to actress turned professional poker player Mimi Rogers - who is believed to have introduced him to Scientology - followed by Nicole Kidman.

    Skeptic: Katie Holmes is said to dislike and distrust Scientology - of which her estranged husband is a vocal advocate - and no longer wants their daughter to be raised in accordance with its doctrines

    Skeptic: Katie Holmes is said to dislike and distrust Scientology - of which her estranged husband is a vocal advocate - and no longer wants their daughter to be raised in accordance with its doctrines



    Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

    The comments below have not been moderated.

    I wish i had their problems!

    I wonder if the latest episode in the life of this loon will get him leaping about Oprah's sofa...

    What gives this woman the right to sole custody of the child of a marriage. The child is as much her husband's as hers and he has just as much right to custody. It really makes me angry that the majority of women think they have a God given right to the child/ren of a marriage. Men have rights as well

    If his religion does not accept divorce, does a marriage which comes after the divorce make it bigamy? - Libby, Houston TX, 30/6/2012 21:31 - It's the same in the catholic church. Your divorce isn't recognised in the catholic church, just means you can't get remarried in the catholic church. Suspect it's the same with Scientolgy

    Carol, Sussex - You can't possibly know what has gone on between them, and for all you know, she may have done her utmost to solve the problems in the marriage, but have been left with no choice but to end it.

    good for her and suri .. may God bless her x

    It wont be recognised because it's not a real church!

    If his religion does not accept divorce, does a marriage which comes after the divorce make it bigamy?

    To be honest its mean of Katie and very immature. No matter how miserable she was/is and especially having a young daughter . She has had plenty of time to go to marriage guidance or considering their wealth to hire a nanny and have romantic weekends or stay with Tom on set in his trailer, just generally try and make things work, if you set your mind to it. But to go behind someones back and file papers, find an apartment, THEN phone your husband probably before you phone the newspapers is horrible. Its also clear she has no communication skills or not able to express that she wasnt having her needs met and give him a chance to respond. It really does come across that she didnt care about him for a long time but was happy to have the trappings of his wealth. Tom, give her whatever she wants and dont stoop to her level, let her have sole custody if she wants, end of the day you have the right to see your daughter and you have the right ot be involved in her life

    I don't his wife cares whether his alleged church recognizes divorce so long as the USA courts do.

    The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.


    Source: www.dailymail.co.uk

    Mississippi Abortion Clinic Law Set To Take Effect - Huffington Post

    JACKSON, Miss. — Mississippi could soon become the only state without an abortion clinic because of a new law taking effect this weekend. Critics say the law would force women to drive hours across the state line to obtain a constitutionally protected procedure, or could even force some to carry unwanted pregnancies to term.

    Top officials, including the governor, say limiting the number of abortions is exactly what they have in mind.

    Republican Gov. Phil Bryant frequently says he wants Mississippi to be "abortion-free."

    "If it closes that clinic, then so be it," Bryant said as in April as he signed the law, which takes effect Sunday.

    Abortion rights supporters have sued, asking a judge to temporarily block the law from taking effect. So far, that hasn't happened.

    The law requires anyone performing abortions at the state's only clinic to be an OB-GYN with privileges to admit patients to a local hospital. Such privileges can be difficult to obtain, and the clinic contends the mandate is designed to put it out of business. A clinic spokeswoman, Betty Thompson, has said the two physicians who do abortions there are OB-GYNs who travel from other states.

    Michelle Movahed of the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights is one of the attorneys representing the Mississippi clinic in its federal lawsuit. She said in an interview Friday that several states – including Mississippi, Kansas and Oklahoma – have tried in the past two or three years to chip away at access to abortion.

    "One of the things that has really been surprising about Mississippi is how open the legislators and elected officials have been about their intentions," Movahed said. "They're not even pretending it's about public safety. They're openly saying they're using this law to try to shut down the last abortion provider in the state."

    The lawsuit by the clinic, Jackson Women's Health Organization, notes that Republican Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves says on his website that the new abortion law "not only protects the health of the mother but should close the only abortion clinic in Mississippi."

    Religious-affiliated hospitals might not grant admitting privileges to those who perform elective abortions, while other hospitals might not grant them to out-of-state physicians who travel to Jackson to work at the clinic. As of Friday, the final business day before the new law kicks in Sunday, physicians working at the clinic had applied for the admitting privileges but hadn't received them.

    The clinic says in the lawsuit that the admitting privileges are not medically necessary. It says complications from abortion are rare, and it notes that under previous state law, it already had an agreement with a Jackson physician who didn't do abortions but has admitting privileges and would help any clinic patient, if needed. Bryant and legislators who pushed the new law said they believe it will be safer for a woman who develops complications if the same doctor who does an abortion at a clinic can accompany her to a hospital rather than handing her case over to another physician.

    State attorneys defending the law said in court documents that "the immediate concern that the clinic may be closed on July 1 is ill-founded." They cited administrative procedures the state Health Department uses in activating new laws.

    Health Department inspectors intend to examine the clinic Monday to see if it is complying with the new law, a department spokeswoman said. If the clinic is not in compliance – which the clinic itself acknowledges will likely be the case – it would have 10 days to file a plan to correct its shortcomings. Then, an administrative hearing would be held at least 30 days later, and there could be an unspecified time allowed for an appeal.

    The Jackson clinic sits a few miles north of the state Capitol, in a trendy neighborhood with upscale restaurants and vintage clothing stores. The nondescript building, with fading mauve paint, sits on a small hill on one of Jackson's busiest streets. A black vinyl tarp is attached to the fence leading from a parking lot to the patients' entrance, blocking most of the view from a public sidewalk where people gather several times a week to pray and protest.

    Outside the clinic one day last week, at least a dozen people from a local Nazarene church sang hymns, read aloud from the Bible and prayed for an end to abortion. Among them was 51-year-old Patricia Frazier, who lives in the Jackson suburb of Clinton. Looking through an opening in the black tarp, Frazier spoke to a man who was standing by the clinic entrance. He had brought a woman to there for the counseling that state law requires at least 24 hours before an abortion can be done.

    "You need me to help you with your friend?" Frazier asked over the fence.

    The man, 30-year-old Girard Shirley of Jackson, smiled and slowly shook his head.

    "Nah," Shirley said. "To be honest with you, I don't even know if the baby's mine, anyway."

    Frazier showed Shirley a brown rubber model of a fetus at about 12 weeks' development – about the length of a grown woman's index finger. Shirley said he'd never given much thought to how that might look.

    "Let her know we're here to help her – her and her baby," Frazier said.

    Shirley listened and said, "Yeah, I'll talk to her."

    "This is all about money. They want your money," Frazier said, nodding toward the clinic. "This help is free."

    In an interview moments later, away from the people who were praying, Shirley said he had driven his friend to the clinic because she needed help and he needed gasoline money. Would he be willing to drive her out of state for an abortion if there were no clinic in Mississippi?

    "I probably would take her," he said. He paused, then added: "No, I wouldn't. I got bad tires and stuff."

    Two days later, Shirley said the woman he had driven to the clinic had stuck with her decision to have an abortion.

    The state Health Department website shows 2,297 abortions, listed as "induced terminations," were performed in Mississippi in 2010, the most recent year for which statistics were available. The vast majority of those – 2,251 – were performed on Mississippi residents. The site does not specify how many were done at the clinic and how many in other offices or hospitals.

    Mississippi physicians who perform fewer than 10 abortions a month can avoid having their offices regulated as an abortion clinic, and thus avoid restrictions in the new law. The Health Department said it doesn't have a record of how many physicians perform fewer than 10 abortions a month. Clinic operators say almost all the abortions in the state are done in their building.

    The clinic says if it closes, most women would have to go out of state to terminate a pregnancy – something that could create financial problems for people in one of the poorest states in the nation. From Jackson, it's about a 200-mile drive to clinics in New Orleans; Mobile, Ala.; or Memphis, Tenn.

    Related on HuffPost:


    Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

    Katy Perry: 'Watching Russell Brand divorce in doc was uncomfortable' - Digital Spy

    Source: www.digitalspy.co.uk

    New by-law bans swimming in River Thames - BBC News

    A new by-law has banned people from swimming in the River Thames without prior permission from the Port of London Authority (PLA).

    The PLA has grown concerned by an upsurge in so-called wild swimming, made popular by comedian David Walliams' 140-mile Sport Relief swim.

    The authority said the ban was needed because it had a responsibility for the safety of all river users.

    The measure is due to come into effect on Sunday.

    From Sunday, a person will need prior written permission to swim anywhere in the Thames between Crossness in east London and Putney Bridge in south-west London.

    The PLA said it had seen an increased interest in river swimming since David Walliams swam the length of the Thames from Lechdale, Gloucestershire to Westminster Bridge in central London last year.

    But the river is potentially dangerous, with tides, strong currents, and whirlpools.

    'Evasive action'

    The PLA's chief executive Richard Everett, said there were good reasons for stopping people wading in.

    He said: "We have a responsibility not only to the individuals, but also to other river users.

    "There's always a risk that if a boat comes across a swimmer, it has to take evasive action and that puts the people on the boat at risk, as well as other boats."

    The law does not apply to people "undertaking diving activity" or "engaged in the emergency repair or inspection of vessels or structures".

    Journalist Matthew Parris criticised the move.

    In 2010 he admitted diving in to the Thames in the middle of the night, making his way across, aided by a friend on the opposite bank who held a torchlight.

    He was criticised at the time, especially as he misjudged the tidal currents and was swept upstream.

    He said: "Swimming in the Thames is dangerous, swimming in the sea is dangerous, swimming in any river is dangerous.

    "There are all kinds of dangers and they're dangers that we take into account before we try it."


    Source: www.bbc.co.uk

    Sussex Downs students get into the Olympic spirit - eastbourneherald.co.uk

    YEAR one BTEC Business students from the Eastbourne campus of Sussex Downs College recently held an Olympic event to celebrate London 2012.

    The sponsored event was attended by the mayor and mayoress of Eastbourne with all the proceeds going to the team’s nominated charity, Great Ormond Street.

    The games involved students from BTEC Sport and Sport Science who represented seven countries from Team GB to Team China. They competed in a wide range of events from fun activities such as tug of war, egg and spoon and relay race.

    Organisers say the event was a triumph with all teams entering into the Olympic spirit. The medals were awarded by James Kirby, a student at Sussex Downs College, and Keith Leech a Science Lecturer at Park College, both of whom are Olympic Torch Bearers.

    James will be running with the Olympic Torch in Lewes on July 17 and Keith will also be completing his run on July 17 in Hastings. Both were nominated for their outstanding work within the community.

    The overall day was won by Team Australia, which in the end had a landslide victory. Second and third place however where contested between Team USA and Team GB, with Team USA taking second place after a nail biting relay final.

    The teams were sponsored for each event and raised more than £500 which included money from Molly Woods, who raised £150 by herself.



    Source: www.eastbourneherald.co.uk

    TomKat to Split: Katie Holmes Files for Divorce from Scientologist Hubby Tom Cruise - ibtimes.co.uk

    Like us on Facebook   

    "This is a personal and private matter for Katie and her family. Katie's primary concern remains, as it always has been, her daughter's best interest," Holmes's attorney Jonathan Wolfe said to People in a statement.

    Cruise, 49, got the blow from his 33 year old wife just a few days before his 50th birthday on 3 July.

    Blindsided Cruise

    Sources say that Tom Cruise was totally uninformed about Holmes' decision to end their marriage until he learned about the divorce suit. The actor is in Iceland, filming his new sci-fi film Oblivion.

    Is Scientology to Blame?

    Scientology is supposedly the major factor behind the divorce. Cruise has been following Scientology since the 1990s and his first wife, actress Mimi Rogers, was believed to have introduced him to the controversial religion that rose in the 20th century. Cruise, an advocate for the Church of Scientology, has been known for being outspoken and giving controversial statements on psychiatry.

    The "irreconcilable differences" of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, who married in November 2006, are also said to be related to their six year old daughter Suri Cruise's religion choices. While Cruise has been arguing that Scientology should be an important part of Suri's life at her age, Holmes did not want him to control religion-related matters, according to insiders, TMZ reports.

    Follow us on LinkedIn Follow IBTimes LinkedIn LinkedIn


    Source: www.ibtimes.co.uk

    Hailsham takes the lead helping vulnerable people - Lewes Today

    A PIONEERING new scheme has been signed up by 22 shops, businesses and various other organisations in Hailsham – to help people with learning difficulties who might be in distress.

    The cutting edge initiative has been organised by East Sussex County Council and backed by other authorities including Hailsham Town Council.

    Hailsham is the first town in the county to sign up to the scheme which aims to help people with learning difficulties feel safer when out-and-about.

    A County Spokesman explained: “If a person with learning disabilities who has a ‘I need help’ card enters a ‘Safe Place’ because they are distressed, the staff in the safe place can assist them - by either offering them somewhere to sit until they feel better/happier, or talking to them and making them feel welcome, and contacting the emergency contact found on the individuals ‘I need help’ card.

    “Or if necessary the ‘Safe Place’ may support the individual in contacting the emergency services or contact them on their behalf if they are unable to do so.”

    The county council is promoting the scheme following last week’s ‘Learning Disability Week which ran from June 18 to 24.

    Other shops, businesses and organisations have been urged to join the scheme.

    County Cllr Carl Maynard said: “I’m delighted that so many businesses, which include shops, leisure centres and restaurants, and organisations such the town council have already signed up and I look forward to others getting involved soon.”

    His colleague, County Cllr Bill Bentley, who is also a town councillor,added: “Safe Places is a national initiative and I’m really pleased that Hailsham is the first town in East Sussex to join. We’ve got involved in this scheme in response to the views and experiences expressed by people with learning disabilities in East Sussex.”

    Hailsham businesses and organisations joining the Safe Places scheme will be given an information pack and logo and stickers to display at their premises. The scheme was officially launched in Hailsham High Street yesterday, June 28.

    To find out more about the scheme phone: 01323 464481 or email hollie.farley@eastsussex.gov.uk for more information.



    Source: www.sussexexpress.co.uk